Well, think about it and talk with someone you trust. Dorming can be great fun and safe. Especially when just getting started.Thank you! This event probably will be in my reasons of not dorming at my college.
Well, think about it and talk with someone you trust. Dorming can be great fun and safe. Especially when just getting started.Thank you! This event probably will be in my reasons of not dorming at my college.
Seems unlikely he would be targeted at someone else's house at 3 am. IMOE was the target. He fell in the hallway between the 2nd floor bedroom and the kitchen. X was aware of a situation , saw E fall, and retreated to the bed. She resisted and fought like hell. The girls upstairs were still awake but were vocal in the fist fight earlier, They were collateral damage. Theory only.
E was the target because of jealousy. Look at failed pledges of Sigma Chi. Why try to kill a wolf in the wolf's den? The wolf is far more vulnerable while outside the den on an escapade.
And why aren’t they looking at video from before 3am? Wouldn’t they want to see the perp staking out the house, going in the house, etc.? Or do they already know how they got there and just want to know when they left?Ok, I find this interesting. They're looking for video between 3 and 6 am on the morning of the murders. The 3 makes sense, as they'd be able to determine the last phone activity from the survivors. The 6 is interesting though, especially considering the bodies weren't discovered until almost 6 hours later.
So what closes the gap? What happened at 6 that told them the murders had already occurred by then?
An autopsy determining time of death doesn't necessarily tell you when the suspect left the scene.
Something else is telling them that...
They're laser focused on getting this psychopath. I hope this whole thing for them ends soon so they can properly grieve.This is Kaylee Goncalves parents speaking to FOX NEWS Parents of Idaho murder victim Kaylee Goncalves speak out | Fox News Video
I’ll think about it, thank you though.Well, think about it and talk with someone you trust. Dorming can be great fun and safe. Especially when just getting started.
I don’t this one is possible, if so, the females would have signs of sexual assault.3. Enraged incel that may have had a passing interaction with one or more of the household residents.
I just recently graduated high school and started college this year. It just makes me feel scared that this event can possibly happen anywhere. Even with people who are around my age.
Please don't live your life in fear. This is an extremely rare event. You are at a point in your life when you need to spread your wings, be aware of risks but still take measured risks. Find your way and live your life fully no matter where it leads you. Listen to people you trust but also think for yourself.I just recently graduated high school and started college this year. It just makes me feel scared that this event can possibly happen anywhere. Even with people who are around my age.
My list of possible crime scenarios. MOO
1. Enraged neighbor unknown to any of the house residents that had reached a breaking point in regards to partying and noise late into night.
2. Acquaintance that couldn’t deal with what lay ahead for particular household residents, acting either on their own, or even paying a third party to commit the crime.
3. Enraged incel that may have had a passing interaction with one or more of the household residents.
4. Fundamentalist that disapproved of the lifestyle of the household residents.
5. Random mass murder.
MOO, hoping this is general enough to pass muster with the
Unless he'd fought with an outsider during the after party....someone who already had beef.Seems unlikely he would be targeted at someone else's house at 3 am. IMO
Wow this interview with Kaylee’s mom and sister was very powerful. That they feel they can’t mourn properly until this is solved.Not the interview I'm looking for, but an important one...
Family of Moscow homicide victim continues to speak out
Kaylee’s mother has said she called ex-boyfriend J. Did not say much about the calls other than Kaylee wanted J to come over and made some appeal to him about them having a dog together. I don’t know if this info was in voice messages she has heard personally or whether the info was relayed to her. Also don’t know if Kaylee spoke with J directly or left voice messages or both. That was not specified in the Fox interview I saw.At 9:37 this morning, someone posted an article that adjusted the time to 2-5. I, again personally, was trying to figure how they got so tight a window with the 3-4. That is really hard to do. If K left a voice-mail for J at 2:52 that would get the 3 am, but no one has said such happened. If there is no proof it was K or M calling J with their phones, anyone could have been calling using those phones for the 26 minutes of calling, imo.
There is a law that requires certain words and language be used in police statements? Say it ain't so. Source?Chief Fry seems utterly ignorant of both proper English usage and the law on the issue related to police statements and law enforcement.
Yes in this Fox interview her parents talk a lot positively about her ex boyfriend and basically say they were on just a short break and the parents fully expected they would marry someday. Also say that Kaylee had been at home for a week and a half and went to Moscow on Friday the main point of the trip was to show Maddie the new vehicle she had. They also said Maddie’s fam do not want to do media so the Goncalves family are speaking out for both families.Kaylee’s mother has said she called ex-boyfriend J. Did not say much about the calls other than Kaylee wanted J to come over and made some appeal to him about them having a dog together. I don’t know if this info was in voice messages she has heard personally or whether the info was relayed to her. Also don’t know if she spoke with J directly or left voice messages or both. That was not specified in the Fox interview I saw.
Too many court decisions to cite up to the US Supreme Court. A particularly relevant one is Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno, where the court said shall = may. We are talking about thousands of decisions clarifying English usage in law and law enforcement. Does the chief need to be cognizant of all of these? No. Does he need to comply with them and have lawyers on staff to ensure he does? Yes. Not my opinion. It is the law he swore to uphold. At this point he does not seem to be complying with the law and is undermining his own investigation through ineptness. Worst case is the killer gets free and the county gets sued. Someone needs to wake him up.There is a law that requires certain words and language be used in police statements? Say it ain't so. Source?
The point is, it is NOT their choice. The law defines the language to be used. They seem to be ignorant of it. Not a good sign of competance. I'm actually hopeful they see my posts and get the people on board to tighten up their act.
Where is this decision/ruling and does it apply to LE press releases for ongoing investigations that are exempt from public disclosure?the US Supreme Court have long upheld that public statements by officials must adhere to legal definitions.
There is no such law, the case you cite is a TORT, has nothing to do with regulating police statements. There is no language law. What the charging code? What's the penalty?Too many court decisions to cite up to the US Supreme Court. A particularly relevant one is Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno, where the court said shall = may. We are talking about thousands of decisions clarifying English usage in law and law enforcement. Does the chief need to be cognizant of all of these? No. Does he need to comply with them and have lawyers on staff to ensure he does? Yes. Not my opinion. It is the law he swore to uphold. At this point he does not seem to be complying with the law and is undermining his own investigation through ineptness. Worst case is the killer gets free and the county gets sued. Someone needs to wake him up.
I have to take the "between 3-4 in the morning" with a grain of salt. I think msm is just repeating what the Mayor said in the beginning. This article says:Per this video, 1:45: “Moscow Police said they’ve conducted interviews with at least 30 people seeking more information and are still processing nearly 500 tips.”
Eta: “All four were stabbed between 3 and 4 in the morning”