wnk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
- Messages
- 1,017
- Reaction score
- 13,778
I understand it is. I remember seeing this when it came out and disagreeing with it then. I didn't take the time to prove my point in depth. But if we look at the source in the timeline @wnk created it links to this article.
(you have to click on the article to see that the writer is just showing all the events that happened between 2 and 5)
It seems to be a timeline heading of sorts and is NOT just for time of death.
The time of death links to an article that shows Cathy Mabbutt said early morning hours. I will include a screenshot as well.
2 a.m. to 5 a.m.
This is when Latah County Coroner Cathy Mabbutt said the homicides occurred. Moscow Mayor Art Bettge previously told the Statesman that police told him they believed the deaths were 3-4 a.m.
So if you click on the name Cathy Mabbutt that they are using for their source, it says this:
She said the time of death for Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves is likely in the early morning hours Sunday. Police have shared that the four students were likely at King Road residence sometime after 1:45 a.m.
View attachment 381563
And here is the article link that they use to quote Cathy Mabbutt. It is also linked in her name above.
Coroner: Autopsies confirm cause of death for UI students was stabbing. 'It would have had to been a large knife'
Following Wednesday’s autopsy of the four University of Idaho students found dead Sunday near campus, the Latah County coroner confirmed the cause of death was murder by stabbing.dnews.com
View attachment 381566
Anyway, I see this as a misinterpretation by ws'ers that may not have looked at the article link and realized the 2-5 was a timeline heading itself and not a true statement of time of death. I believe some chose to rely on how the text transferred to a post here which looks much different than viewing the article. In my opinion, our timeline should be changed back to 3-4 as that makes the most sense anyway.
Thanks for the critical look at this. You're right; I think I misinterpreted (based on the way the article was written and some comments from folks on here that were obviously reading it in the same way) that coroner had extended the possible time of death window. I'll fix that in the next timeline update.