Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless he thought he had gone with his parents.
ETA: This is what was stated in the earlier stories according to GGP, but I'm a little confused about that now as the PI is now giving a different story. Just call me
But the sheriff took his stand and dug in his heels and refused to assist in any remedy that would normally have been used when it is believed a child has been abducted. Then, Mr. Vilt paid DK a visit and FINALLY a possible abduction is being recognized.
Just my opinion.
SBM
My opinion is Bowerman pursued abduction as a very viable possibility.
BOISE -- The Lemhi County Sheriff's Office has called in some help from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The NCMEC has sent out one of their search and rescue specialists to help with the search for 2-year-old DeOrr Kunz Jr.
snip
The specialist in DeOrr's case has been dispatched from Wyoming. So he's familiar with the type of environment the Lemhi County Sheriff's Office is searching. Lowery says the specialist is there to offer his expertise and make suggestions to help find DeOrr Kunz Jr.
ktvb.com July 16, 2015
It has occurred to me that the reason the sheriff was dismissing abduction as a real possibility is because the "other direction" he said the case took was specific in that it did not involve abduction. What I mean is that I don't think it was an oversight or a closed-minded stubbornness on his part. I think there was more precision in his decision, based on the behavioral and physical evidence he had. And that's why he called in the FBI, not as a double-check, but because he had enough reason to name four POI's and and turn this into a criminal investigation.
And that's why he don't care care about no stinking staring man driving an expensive-looking black Rube.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The PI has a background in LE. He has been enlisted to help this family in this most terrible loss. In fairness, everyone has been screaming that no one on the family side has been talking to MSM. Now, this gentleman has come out and is trying to bring forth an alternate ( and previously dismissed) theory and is getting Deorr's name back in the public consciousness. Do i think he has some nefarious motive here? No I do not.
I have a 2.5 year old and she is an outgoing, wild little thing. She has a big personality and has never met a stranger in her life. If we took her camping I would have to have my eyes on her at all times. She would ABSOLUTELY wander off. Not every toddler is the same.Only following this case for a few weeks and I hope they find this poor boy alive. I will say having a almost 26 month old myself I do not see she would ever wonder away at this age. I have a 21 year old as well, now she would wonder away in a store when she was 5. I just cannot grasp that a 2 year old in the middle of the woods at a campsite would wonder far from someone they knew. If I walk out of the room for a moment my daughter will scream. I am not accusing just baffled.
The PI has a background in LE. He has been enlisted to help this family in this most terrible loss. In fairness, everyone has been screaming that no one on the family side has been talking to MSM. Now, this gentleman has come out and is trying to bring forth an alternate ( and previously dismissed) theory and is getting Deorr's name back in the public consciousness. Do i think he has some nefarious motive here? No I do not. Is he right? Honestly, who knows? HOW CAN THIS HURT? At this point the parents seem to be behind him. a re-enactment was performed.. a sketch of the sinister man in the black Rubicon is going to be drawn.. and we will see where it takes us, right? Yes, some poor old man who drives a black Rubicon and is totally innocent may be swept into this.. what are the alternatives? Not following through? There may be some collateral damage to a a bystander .. in life there are no guarantees. 4 POI were named because they were there per LE.. maybe there is a 5th POI who was in the area. Many here were quick to want to put some blame on the 2 RSO in Leadore. Lots of sex offender and those who have NEVER OFFENDED can be suspects. Everyone has a first time..
In any event, the PI is trying..probably doing this free of charge, and has gotten our attention and that of the media. In addition, LE was there at the reenactment so he certainly has gotten their attention, also. With all the theories out there.. 1 is right.. the rest are wrong.
Ruling out everything is irresponsible IMO and LE kind of forced the parents' hand, don't you think? MOO
Just my opinion on all of this.
The PI has a background in LE. He has been enlisted to help this family in this most terrible loss. In fairness, everyone has been screaming that no one on the family side has been talking to MSM. Now, this gentleman has come out and is trying to bring forth an alternate ( and previously dismissed) theory and is getting Deorr's name back in the public consciousness. Do i think he has some nefarious motive here? No I do not. Is he right? Honestly, who knows? HOW CAN THIS HURT? At this point the parents seem to be behind him. a re-enactment was performed.. a sketch of the sinister man in the black Rubicon is going to be drawn.. and we will see where it takes us, right? Yes, some poor old man who drives a black Rubicon and is totally innocent may be swept into this.. what are the alternatives? Not following through? There may be some collateral damage to a a bystander .. in life there are no guarantees. 4 POI were named because they were there per LE.. maybe there is a 5th POI who was in the area. Many here were quick to want to put some blame on the 2 RSO in Leadore. Lots of sex offender and those who have NEVER OFFENDED can be suspects. Everyone has a first time..
In any event, the PI is trying..probably doing this free of charge, and has gotten our attention and that of the media. In addition, LE was there at the reenactment so he certainly has gotten their attention, also. With all the theories out there.. 1 is right.. the rest are wrong.
Ruling out everything is irresponsible IMO and LE kind of forced the parents' hand, don't you think? MOO
Just my opinion on all of this.
<snipped for focus>
I think that if your goal is to find the child, you don't immediately embark on a course of proving or disproving anyone's pet theory.
It appears that the PI immediately ruled out everything other than abduction, and he has set himself on a course of proving the abduction theory.
That's not how it works. You gather all the information and evidence and study it systematically, and you follow where the evidence takes you.
<snipped for focus>
I think that if your goal is to find the child, you don't immediately embark on a course of proving or disproving anyone's pet theory.
It appears that the PI immediately ruled out everything other than abduction, and he has set himself on a course of proving the abduction theory.
That's not how it works. You gather all the information and evidence and study it systematically, and you follow where the evidence takes you.
Sorry sonjay, you'd already said what I was trying to say. I'm so slow on this tablet thingy, and you put it so much better than I.
Please bear with me this isn't anything I know about. I've been reading up about cougars as they've been mentioned in the thread.
As I understand cougars don't have dens, but make beds as they move about. Also that they bury what is left of their kill.
The info I read stresses that children must always be with adults or a group, as from a cougars vision children having high voices and sudden movements are attractive as prey. The fact that cougars can leap up to 30 ft from standing, and their methods are silent and they are rarely seen, does make me wonder what are the chances little Deorr has fallen foul this way?
Is it totally out of the question?