LisaB
Well-Known Member
remember the human factor, folks. I've said this umpteen times on the mcstay thread. people have egos. period.
I agree with the poster that said (sorry I can't quote nor thank posts) JM might be the guilty party here but DK seems the more likely 'suspect'. Look at exactly how IR worded his interview. he might not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but his attorney is...no one, not one of them, will describe what happened from Friday morning until the 911 call whether it be 17 minutes or 4 hours. doesn't matter...IMO they were all chemically under the influence (stoned, drunk, I don't care). IMO little deorr never made it to the local store (that was such a subject of stress for DR in their one and only interview regarding the truck and the other little blonde boy sighting). JMO either Thursday night or Friday morning something awful transpired (at the hands of the parents, yes I can say that within TOS now) and RW/IR were too "compromised" to remember.
EATON: What do you remember what happened up there?
REINWAND: I dont want to comment on that.
EATON: Do you remember the last time you saw little DeOrr?
REINWAND: No comment.
EATON: But he was up there?
REINWAND: Yes, he was.
EATON: He was up there, you saw him, you know he was there.
REINWAND: Yes.
http://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/01/isaac-reinwand-i-had-nothing-to-do-with-deorrs-disappearance/
Nobody asked "Was he ALIVE the last time you saw him? Are you CERTAIN of that?" If he said he saw the boy alive but sleeping, that would be a "Yes." followed by a "Well, no, not really."