Niner
Long time Websleuther
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 86,091
- Reaction score
- 289,272
kammiemc said:I totally respect your opinion/theory, but it does make me want to ask (hope this is okay) how do you reconcile that the parents haven't been able to tell the same story twice and that they consistently and repeatedly both failed the questions asking if they know what happened to DeOrr and where he is? (And this part is just my impression, but I know a lot of others share it, but I will add to the lying the lack of panic and concern for their son, or getting the word out, all while they were claiming he was abducted?)
To me, the above doesn't seem to be in line with DeOrr wandering off and the parents innocently discovering him missing. And I don't think they would pull a mass 7-month charade to hide what they know if it was only that they were doing something slightly neglectful or embarrassing when he wandered.
Do you think LE/FBI/Klein are incorrect in their determination and analysis? Or that the parents have been lying but for reasons other than that they had involvement or knowledge of what happened?
I'm open!!! Thx in advance.
Sorry - it took so long to post - been busy reading Juan Martinez book thread and his book!
Okay - re same story - I was thinking that at first, they were both in shock and just didn't remember the "little" things, i.e. who made breakfast... and just continued to "add" to their story as time went on. And Sheriff Bowerman, at the beginning, did say he believed them, so there must have been something there as to why he said that.
repeatedly both failed the questions asking if they know what happened to DeOrr and where he is?
this part... did the test show "failed" or "inconclusive" ?? I don't recall; but if "incolnclusive" - then I would think - "what happened to DeOrr" - confusion on their part, because they really don't know "what happened", as he wandered off or did someone snatch him and "where he is?" - they both don't really know "where he is". I don't know "how" lie detectors work, so if I was asked, say the "where he is" question, my mind would be racing thinking all the places he "could" be. Am I making sense? LOL!
I don't think they would pull a mass 7-month charade to hide what they know if it was only that they were doing something slightly neglectful or embarrassing when he wandered.
Maybe it is "too" embarrassing...
Do you think LE/FBI/Klein are incorrect in their determination and analysis?
Well, I don't really know "what" they have determined as I haven't seen much of their analysis, facts of this case or even a Timeline of events. If they could give us a Timeline (it would be interesting to see if LE and Klein's Timelines are different or the same!) - maybe that would actually change my mind on IF they had anything to do with little DeOrr "disappearing".
BUT!
especially this:
TxJan1971 said: Incident happened on Federal land
KIC investigating as a death case
Still determining accident vs homicide with intent
Closely approaching the Prosecutorial phase
Everyone on the same page to include FBI, Bonneville, Lemhi, Klein
There is evidence that shows what happened
physical evidence obtained early in the case matched out later into the case
Waiting on more lab tests to come back
Couple more items taken into custody yesterday (1-27-16) already on the way to East Coast
Quantico is coming in to decipher information (1-28-16)
nothing to indicate there was any other person involved
2 POI's w/ 2 axillary persons that were still vetting out
not a matter of whether charges will be filed, its what charges
Unless there has been movement on this case - and I just haven't read about it - I'm only on Feb. 21st posting... like you said later in a post - "anything could have happened".
okay - posting this and have 3 more pages to read to catch up with you all!