Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know all of us have come into following this case at different times so we are at different points of sleuthing. That being said I can't bother with trying to piece together timelines or what happened based upon what the parents have put out there. It's like trying to solve a crossword puzzle but you only have the blank word grid and no questions.
I wonder if there's any way the vehicles' mileage that weekend could have been known from Odometer readings? I realize...a lonnnnnnnnng shot, but just thought I'd ask.
Well, that certainly cleared things right up.
I agree and am hoping this is the case.
The other thing that has changed this time around is LE is coming at it from a totally different angle. The early searches were most likely focused with the theory that the boy could have walked off or an animal took the boy and dragged him away. So the searching would have focused on spots where an animal could wander away.
But this time around I think LE is going to assume a vehicle could have been used to transmit the boy's body. So I think their searching will include places farther away that a vehicle could reach.
I would not be surprised if LE has different groups searching in different areas and some groups may be much further away than the campground area than we think.
It may be time to get out the Google maps and think like a criminal and put some Xs on the map.
If you had a very limited time to hide the boy and your starting point was the campground then where would you drive to ?
Your time limit would be limited to a store run into town. It could be more time if you got up earlier than everyone else and managed to leave the campground while everyone was sleeping.
Would you stay within 5 miles? 10 miles? Even further?
I just wanted to jump in and say I find it very unusual that IR, as far as we know, is still a POI, but after a couple of interviews, no longer needs an attorney. I don't have the link, but it was just said recently. He claims he saw the baby when his parents got back from the store around one on Friday, but many believe the baby was never there. I am also confused by the 2 different stories that he was with GGP when they were supposed to be watching the baby, but I swear I also heard him say he was down by the water not far from the parents. These are a few things bouncing around in my mind, especially him not needing an attorney anymore? Say what? Why?
BTW I am still confused about these stops Thursday night and Friday Morning. Does anybody happen to know of a good map showing routes and places they stopped those two times. I'm all turned around.
I thought they came up one way and spent the night then went into town the other way.
Thanks for any help or a link to a decent map showing where they were, went.
Do we know which direction DK hauled off too? There is an unnamed road that runs along side the reservoir and dead ends a few miles out. It looks like there is a tree line between the bank and the road, so my thoughts about DK driving through the shallow bank of the reservoir to get to the road is probably not valid, but it might explain the scent trail stopping there.
I'd like to know where that 3 mile search radius was centered. It would make sense to say it was at the campground. There is just so much more dense forest it would be impossible to know where to begin!
If he made a proffer, meaning exchanging information for immunity, he wouldn't need a lawyer anymore.
Here is a link to BYO's map of the case that is posted in the Media thread. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zW6CBVbxpdYA.klXz-SrbHNBI Somebody local mentioned early on that the only practical way to get to the campground from Idaho would be to go up Rt 28, through Leadore and then down SR 105/Swan Basin Rd to the campground. (While it looks like there is another route on the maps, there is one part of the road that is not passable.)
Here is a link to BYO's map of the case that is posted in the Media thread. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zW6CBVbxpdYA.klXz-SrbHNBI Somebody local mentioned early on that the only practical way to get to the campground from Idaho would be to go up Rt 28, through Leadore and then down SR 105/Swan Basin Rd to the campground. (While it looks like there is another route on the maps, there is one part of the road that is not passable.)
I don't see the non-passable road on the map in that link but i wonder if it's the unmarked road that cuts over East from 105 to Big timber Creek.
Looking at a satellite image on Google Maps there is a section that looks questionable though possibly navigable with a truck..hard to tell without seeing it first hand.
Thanks for that bit of info though. A route change there would add 25min to the allotted concealment time in my theory.
I don't see the non-passable road on the map in that link but i wonder if it's the unmarked road that cuts over East from 105 to Big timber Creek.
Looking at a satellite image on Google Maps there is a section that looks questionable though possibly navigable with a truck..hard to tell without seeing it first hand.
Thanks for that bit of info though. A route change there would add 25min to the allotted concealment time in my theory.
Coming from Idaho Falls, Google directions will tell you to turn west on NF 212 (Texas Creek Rd.) south of Leadore. However, if you go that way, you have to drive across Big Timber Creek, which could be problematic if there is too much water (and maybe even more difficult if you're hauling a camper). Other posters earlier in this forum indicated crossing that creek would not be possible (no bridge). So, it seems that they would not have gone that way, but rather drove to Leadore and taken Swan Basin Road, NF 105, and then NF 172.
I'm not sure if this has been brought up here in the past or not so I thought I would share. SB responded to a question about IR on the Lemhi FB page on 1/28.
Question:
I have heard that there was a mistake on Isaac Reinwand's police records and he was never charged with a certain crime at all. Could you please confirm publically if this is true, because a lot of people have made wild speculations about his involvement in the DeOrr Kunz disappearance and have judged Mr. Reinwand very harshly due to this past charge.
SB's response:
Lemhi County Sheriff's Office You see certain things on his rap sheet, however, I have not been able to confirm they are true. Not sure what is going on here. Where it shows he was arrested, I read, in the report, where he was a witness. Very confusing, in the least......Sheriff Bowerman
https://www.facebook.com/LemhiCountySheriffsOffice/?ref=ts&fref=ts
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If he made a proffer, meaning exchanging information for immunity, he wouldn't need a lawyer anymore.
I would think that they would stay on the back roads and not get on the highway (for fear of being seen and/or being caught on a webcam or surveillance cam, etc.). Since they knew they had to visit the store to get a receipt, I think they would head out of the campground towards town, and then take a side road somewhere. I would think they would go at least 3 to 5 miles, but probably not 10, since the road conditions probably weren't all that great (slow going). I would think they might head towards more forested areas rather than the open sagebrush. JMO. I'm going to go look at some maps/imagery.