I don't have reason to think either are criminally responsible, either, to be clear.
But they are evasive and not telling all about cultish aspects of LDS and their radicalized interpretation of it, IMO. They are also not being forthcoming about all the see on hindsight. I understand and forgive missed red flags and danger signals because of past beliefs.
I feel less patient with pretending to have never been sucked into a belief system that caused danger signals to be missed. Because that forces evasive answers about those danger signs.
I would rather a witness report what really happened and say, "it's obvious to me now that it wasn't okay, but at the time, it just seemed normal to me," than to be evasive and forgetful and claim to have never been- like minded- as they call it.
Of course I am grateful for both of their testimonies. But I'm not feeling it that either of those two are being 100% honest with anybody, including themselves.
MOO