Emi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2012
- Messages
- 10,582
- Reaction score
- 48,470
I do believe that hair is some of the physical evidence we've been waiting for. It seems so nonchalant for first thing Monday morning...oh, by the way, the hair found in the tape on JJ belonged to Lori.
(although my long hairs, and my daughter's, are everywhere in our house...so I expect the defense to claim it was just by transfer)
Lori claimed that the children died in Alex's apartment, so her hair would have been picked up there. She didn't live there.I do believe that hair is some of the physical evidence we've been waiting for. It seems so nonchalant for first thing Monday morning...oh, by the way, the hair found in the tape on JJ belonged to Lori.
(although my long hairs, and my daughter's, are everywhere in our house...so I expect the defense to claim it was just by transfer)
I do believe that hair is some of the physical evidence we've been waiting for. It seems so nonchalant for first thing Monday morning...oh, by the way, the hair found in the tape on JJ belonged to Lori.
(although my long hairs, and my daughter's, are everywhere in our house...so I expect the defense to claim it was just by transfer)
Her defense attorney is questioning the testing procedure. The discovery must not be meaningless.Finding her hair in the duct tape truly is meaningless. However, you would think a goddess who doesn't have to eat or go to the bathroom would also have hair that doesn't fall out lol.
Yeah. They slept in the same room!I do believe that hair is some of the physical evidence we've been waiting for. It seems so nonchalant for first thing Monday morning...oh, by the way, the hair found in the tape on JJ belonged to Lori.
(although my long hairs, and my daughter's, are everywhere in our house...so I expect the defense to claim it was just by transfer)
Her defense attorney is questioning the testing procedure. The discovery must not be meaningless.
It would be far easier for the jury to understand that a hair could have been picked up than to understand the technical explanation.Of course because the defense knows jury isn't like us true crime junkies
Longer blonde hair?can anyone explain why they only tested it against Tylee, MelG & Lori?
( Wouldn't they also want to test it against JJ & Alex?)
I don't think its meaningless at all. Jurors want direct evidence, and this can be seen as direct evidence even if explained away by the defense. IMOFinding her hair in the duct tape truly is meaningless. However, you would think a goddess who doesn't have to eat or go to the bathroom would also have hair that doesn't fall out lol.
Is she allowed to answer Def questions on topics like transfer? This expert witness is just DNA analyst.It would be far easier for the jury to understand that a hair could have been picked up than to understand the technical explanation.