Considering
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2012
- Messages
- 2,258
- Reaction score
- 3,028
Discussing the case on HLN now.
Guess I missed it. All i'm hearing is Corona virus. IMODiscussing the case on HLN now.
How bizarre this cult is. Sweat lodge, multiple marriages and a pool party when someone is murderd, plus honeymoon and vacations when kids disappear and even more people die.A sweat lodge? Do they do vision quests or something? Jmo
The 18th and 19th I think. 2 days for an arraignment. Hm. Jmo
Does anyone know why SLC is the epicenter for the meeting? You know, rather than any of the other myriad states the couple have been operating in? The deaths were in Arizona and Idaho. I found this newspiece stating that the FBI Field Office is in SLC, maybe that's why?
ID, AZ authorities to meet in SLC for Lori Vallow-Daybell case
The books are rubbish and it is saving people from wasting their money so it is doing them a service. It is all constant rehashing of the same stuff but by different authors. I hope people realise what the whole book/conference/podcast nonsense really is now this story has gone viral. Its fraudulent IMO.I totally agree with this. There are several people involved in this case who are vigilantes serving out justice wherever and however they see fit. If you read the book and hated it, blast away, but otherwise, don't send clicks his way.
She may not talk but Chad may. He said he would. If no one talks they will be charged with murder and fraud. But if she isn't going to talk, why bother paying an attorney? MOO.
It was on “True Crime Live” and Joseph Scott Morgan was one of the people interviewed. Among other things, he was asked about Tammy’s autopsy/toxicology and agreed it could take up to a year for the results due to embalming and the amount of time she was buried before exhumation. He also said that Alex’s results would be back already.Guess I missed it. All i'm hearing is Corona virus. IMO
The books are rubbish and it is saving people from wasting their money so it is doing them a service. It is all constant rehashing of the same stuff but by different authors. I hope people realise what the whole book/conference/podcast nonsense really is now this story has gone viral. Its fraudulent IMO.
Yes, the last session was an arraignment (where the charges are read) and a bail hearing. The next step is the preliminary hearing on the 18th.Part of that might be that they expect more to testify than they can fit in one day of court, but part of it is definitely that the prosecutor had one witness who it was going to be an issue getting there soon enough on the 18th, but could be on the 19th IIRC the discussion when setting the dates at the last session. (Wasn't that the arraignment that happened and this is the preliminary hearing? I'm not positive, but think those are the terms that apply. This is where they show enough evidence to convince the judge they have enough to move forward, right? Whereas the first one was strictly to set bail and had no real evidence pertaining to the charges, only that pertaining to flight risk.)
I do not think that comments written by a soon to be ex husband, during a divorce, are credible to be used as factual source documents about another person.
I don't believe them, or disbelieve the documents. Just stating that divorce paperwork is probably not going to portray anyone in a completely accurate manner.
We can all carry torches and pitchforks around Lori Vallow. But let's use actual evidence for a conviction.
Thank you! If I remember correctly that guy is super knowledgeable, sorry I missed it. Thanks again for the recap!It was on “True Crime Live” and Joseph Scott Morgan was one of the people interviewed. Among other things, he was asked about Tammy’s autopsy/toxicology and agreed it could take up to a year for the results due to embalming and the amount of time she was buried before exhumation. He also said that Alex’s results would be back already.
I've been wondering the same. But I'm guessing along with the high bail, she is just plain disliked by bondsmen. It might not help unless they can pay the court directly. Jmo
One more week till the arraignment right?
KUTV- Utah reports this morning:
Utah, Idaho, Arizona authorities to discuss suspicious deaths linked to Lori Vallow
Best part of this is BBM:
Authorities have not only linked Vallow-Daybell to the disappearance of her two children, Joshua "JJ" Vallow and Tylee Ryan, but also believe she may have possibly been involved in the deaths of her ex-husband Charles Vallow, her brother Alex Cox, and her husband Chad Daybell's former wife, Tammy Daybell.
If they have evidence that she was involved in Alex’s death, they’ve got conspiracy.
Source:What Do the Courts Consider in a Conspiracy Case? - FindLaw
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. A person may be convicted of conspiracy even if the actual crime was never committed.
Agreement Requirement
Intent Requirement
- Lori, Alex, Chad agree that Charles is a non-believer, has been taken over by (Nick Schneider or Nick Snyder) must now be eliminated to further the mission of Chad’s “Gathering”, using insurance money to fund the cause. Unfortunately, plan goes skiwampus when Kay gets the money.
- Lori, Alex, Chad, Melani agree that next up for elimination is Brandon. Fortunately, plan goes skiwampus as bullet misses target.
- Lori, Alex, Chad agree, Tammy must go. Chad had a vision of her dying. October 9, “Paintball” gunman misses target. October 19, murder succeeds. Chad collects insurance money to further the mission.
- December 12 - unclear if Lori, Chad and Alex agree that Alex must die or Lori, Chad and as yet unnamed suspects decide this. At any rate - Alex is dead.
Intention is key to prove conspiracy. This speaks to the mental state of those involved. All involved in the conspiracy must agree on the intended outcome. The players seem to have agreed that the outcome of this idiotic plan is the end of the world in July 2020.
Potential Evidence:
Overt Act Requirement
- Documented evidence via Charles Vallow divorce papers that there is an end of times mission in play.
- Documented evidence via Charles Vallow email to Adam Cox of falsified letter to Chad Daybell
- IP statements to LE as reported in Brandon’s response to Melani’s custody case.
- What has been discovered behind the paywall at AVOW?
- What has been discovered in the records of the group that cannot be named?
- What has been discovered on Lori, Chad, Alex and Melani’s phones?
In most jurisdictions, at least one co-conspirator must take some concrete step in furtherance of the plan.
What is is not acceptable or accounted for in my theory are the children. One can only hope that one of the co-conspirators will crack and give up their whereabouts. I would hope the Daybell family will finally put pressure on their Son, Father, Brother - CHAD, to do what is right by God and the goodness of humanity, and let the world know where these precious children are.
- Alex
- Lori, Chad, Alex or other unnamed POI at storage unit
- Calling Melani Gibb to lie about the whereabouts of Tylee and JJ.
Does anyone know why SLC is the epicenter for the meeting? You know, rather than any of the other myriad states the couple have been operating in? The deaths were in Arizona and Idaho. I found this newspiece stating that the FBI Field Office is in SLC, maybe that's why?
ID, AZ authorities to meet in SLC for Lori Vallow-Daybell case
The field office location might be part of it. It's also a reasonable spot that while not as easy for the AZ and ID people as being at home would be for one of them, it is reasonably accessable to both, so a good compromise. MOO
Part of that might be that they expect more to testify than they can fit in one day of court, but part of it is definitely that the prosecutor had one witness who it was going to be an issue getting there soon enough on the 18th, but could be on the 19th IIRC the discussion when setting the dates at the last session. (Wasn't that the arraignment that happened and this is the preliminary hearing? I'm not positive, but think those are the terms that apply. This is where they show enough evidence to convince the judge they have enough to move forward, right? Whereas the first one was strictly to set bail and had no real evidence pertaining to the charges, only that pertaining to flight risk.)