Yes, I wrongly assumed it was Lori's lawyer asking for this information, not Chad's.Lori
Yes, I wrongly assumed it was Lori's lawyer asking for this information, not Chad's.Lori
It's there. The lawyer, talking about bail, says "I would refer the court to the affidavit on number 26 and it talks about the last time they saw the kids..."
Lori
Yes, I wrongly assumed it was Lori's lawyer asking for this information, not Chad's.
It won't be the documents but it will be a list - this is the discovery turned over to the defense in LV's case by way of example -I didn't realize that Idaho had Sunshine laws to see such, great!
But IMO TD had no idea about zombies or light/dark ratings, portals or vibrations. Moo.
The part I've bolded, I'm sure someone has noticed, sounds like it came from someone raised in the 1980s on video games. All New Age teachings that most who were raised in the church would find repugnant.
Respectfully it is a contention. And I think a link is important if he was as was posted. Because he was not asked that in court as was posted. I think accurate information is important. Accurate representation of the few facts we have is important. JMOMy real questions were if anyone remembers seeing Chad with Lori or without, in the company of the kids, and if so when was that.
If you don't think Chad has ever been asked when was the last time he saw the kids I wonder why "the last time they saw the kids" was addressed in the affidavit presented to the court. But that's OK. I didn't think it would be a point of contention.
at the 25:46 mark
It’s not there. And accurate information, especially for people just joining in and not necessarily knowledgeable about how to navigate and verify information is important. JMO
The problem is the attorney didn't specify who the "they" were that saw the children. It could be Chad or someone else.My real questions were if anyone remembers seeing Chad with Lori or without, in the company of the kids, and if so when was that.
If you don't think Chad has ever been asked when was the last time he saw the kids I wonder why "the last time they saw the kids" was addressed in the affidavit presented to the court. But that's OK. I didn't think it would be a point of contention.
READ: The documents charging Lori Vallow Daybell | East Idaho NewsBut you posted this. I still have not found what you are referencing now. But unless I am completely missing it, which I may be, Chad was never asked “when the last time he saw the kids”. This just didn’t happen.
I didn’t realize Idaho had Spud Harvest Break! Sorry... maybe bad timing but it’s true lol. I went down a whole wormhole learning about the history of this.I didn't realize that Idaho had Sunshine laws to see such, great!
I can’t look right now, but I hear the Atty say to reference the affidavit. We don’t have a copy of that correct? Will we get one? So we have no idea what it says.It’s not there. And accurate information, especially for people just joining in and not necessarily knowledgeable about how to navigate and verify information is important. JMO
I would think CD could possibly "explain away" anything Charles told Tammy (jealous, crazy guy). However, if a second source happened to mention to Tammy they were seen together gallivanting around the track at BYUI or elsewhere. That would definitely put it on her radar, especially if he told her he was elsewhere. It may have been a slow dawning of the truth over time ... poor Tammy she didn't see it coming.We don't know for sure if CV was able to contact TD or not. But apparently when Lori moved to Rexburg, her and CD were out in public showing displays of affection (according to MG). So Tammy could have found out in multiple ways.
It's currently sealed.I can’t look right now, but I hear the Atty say to reference the affidavit. We don’t have a copy of that correct? Will we get one? So we have no idea what it says.
It is also almost certain that pressure is building rapidly on both of them now that the public knows without any doubt they were lying and knew the children were dead. To be loathed so deeply while also knowing murder charges are imminent has to be extraordinarily stressful and I expect at least one of them will attempt to cut a deal. That, in turn, very well may lead to the resolution of the whole stinking mess with at least Tammy's death and possibly that of Charles.
She’s not been charged.. that’s what I don’t understand.
Chad Daybell was never asked when he last saw the children. This is what was originally posted.It is right there on this video at the mark you stated. I would suggest people start at 25:10 as it allows for the viewer to hear that the mention of the #26 is being related to the bail request by the state.
"I would refer to the affidavit on number 26 it talks about the last time they saw the kids."
Brilliant! Fantastic reading.RSBM
BBM I can't wait to see which one will attempt to cut that deal!
And, by the way, you caused this to be my "light reading" last night (lol!)
Exploring non-invasive approaches to assist in the detection of clandestine human burials: developing a way forward
Again, so glad you're here & sharing!