Please could you point me to the paragraph where it states dismemberment, I must have missed it. I can find reference to charring, but not dismemberment.
Dismemberment not explicitly stated. If the bones on top of the brick were human, obviously they were seperated from the body. But those bones may have been animal bones meant to throw a searcher off.
The evidence team would give the information "as found" and the dismembered condition of the body is for for the ME to say.
"37. Ground in this area was probed with steel pole and several areas of disturbed gound were
located. During search of this ground, buried cat and dog remains were found.
backhoe was used to dig further layers of din. While doing this, bricks were located
approximately foot below the ground.
38. Once the bricks were discovered the soil was examined and what appeared to be two bones
were located. Based 0n the condition 0f the bones, Cheryl Anderson was not able to
determine whether the bones were human.
39. Methodically, the dirt in this area was searched and several other items of interest were
found including other bones, Chaired tissue and charred bones. Cheryl Anderson indicated
these additional bones, both charred and uncharred and tissue found were human remains."