Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,493
He's a generous guy. Look how much money he gave to those brothers to buy mugging supplies!
AKA hate crime kit.
He's a generous guy. Look how much money he gave to those brothers to buy mugging supplies!
He's a generous guy. Look how much money he gave to those brothers to buy mugging supplies!
" Alternative manner "........Is that a new term for "crooked cover up "?.....LOL !!!....moo
Verified account 5m5 minutes ago
NEW from Chicago: Joe Magats, the first assistant state's attorney who made the final decision to drop the charges against Jussie Smollett, says in an interview: "We didn't exonerate him."
4 replies37 retweets17 likes
Verified account 4m4 minutes ago
Magats, the asst state's atty, said he saw no problems with the police investigation or the evidence against Smollett. The charges against Smollett were dropped in return for his agreement to do community service, he said, and for forfeiting his bond to the city of Chicago.
4 replies21 retweets9 likes
Verified account 3m3 minutes ago
More from the asst state's attorney: "Here's the thing -- we work to prioritize violent crime and the drivers of violent crime. Public safety is our number one priority. I don't see Jussie Smollett as a threat to public safety."
2 replies10 retweets6 likes
Julie BosmanVerified account @juliebosman
"We stand behind the investigation, we stand behind the decision to charge him and we stand behind the charges in the case. The mere fact that it was disposed of in an alternative manner does not mean that there were any problems or infirmities in the case or the evidence."
Just making the point that he is known to be giving to others.IMO
And is getting away with it......mooWho cares? He perpetrated a hate crime.
Philip HollowayVerified account @PhilHollowayEsq
Philip Holloway Retweeted Philip Holloway
#JussieSmollett team can spin it how they wish but he bought himself out of serious offenses in something akin to a sweetheart plea deal
Verified account 5m5 minutes ago
NEW from Chicago: Joe Magats, the first assistant state's attorney who made the final decision to drop the charges against Jussie Smollett, says in an interview: "We didn't exonerate him."
4 replies37 retweets17 likes
Verified account 4m4 minutes ago
Magats, the asst state's atty, said he saw no problems with the police investigation or the evidence against Smollett. The charges against Smollett were dropped in return for his agreement to do community service, he said, and for forfeiting his bond to the city of Chicago.
4 replies21 retweets9 likes
Verified account 3m3 minutes ago
More from the asst state's attorney: "Here's the thing -- we work to prioritize violent crime and the drivers of violent crime. Public safety is our number one priority. I don't see Jussie Smollett as a threat to public safety."
2 replies10 retweets6 likes
Julie BosmanVerified account @juliebosman
"We stand behind the investigation, we stand behind the decision to charge him and we stand behind the charges in the case. The mere fact that it was disposed of in an alternative manner does not mean that there were any problems or infirmities in the case or the evidence."
Charges were dropped. That is a fact.Who cares? He perpetrated a hate crime.
Charges were dropped. That is a fact.
Link to it being a hate crime and it being a hate crime against you.Charges were dropped.He was not exonerated. And he perpetrated a hate crime against me. Those are facts.
Link to it being a hate crime and it being a hate crime against you.Charges were dropped.
If they wanted to not pursue it because they have other priorities, it is what it is but there is no way they should have made this deal without him pleading guilty.
Like it or not they have exonerated him in a lot of peoples eyes, even if they claim they didn't
No, it sounds like they do have evidence. But the case isn't a priority given more serious cases so they made a deal with his bond money and community service. He has not been exonerated. That is my understanding given current statements from authorities.I'll just say this....from day one we were given false information by someone unknown even to LE according to the Superintendent.
Remember how doubt was planted in the minds of the public that they couldn't find anyone in the video aside from Jussie?
I'm sure plenty have egg on their faces at this point so of course they try to save face.
IMO they didn't have any facts to support a case. IMO