What is odd is the deal doesn't seem to require he admits guilt. ??
Jmo
Yes!
What is odd is the deal doesn't seem to require he admits guilt. ??
Jmo
^^^^ This is what went down.........mooExcellent article explaining the politics of Kim Foxx(SA) and Jussie Smolette.
And it was written 2 weeks ago.
Kim Foxx's embarrassing OMG moment in the Jussie Smollett case
I think if they had evidence to prove guilt they would have moved forward.IMONo, it sounds like they do have evidence. But the case isn't a priority given more serious cases so they made a deal with his bond money and community service. He has not been exonerated. That is my understanding given current statements from authorities.
What is odd is the deal doesn't seem to require he admits guilt. ??
Jmo
As I mentioned earlier in this case he paid for a handicapped van for a child so he is known to be charitable for causes. IMO
He‘s fuming, lol.Wow, go Rahm. Impressive.
Why then did they immediately seal the court documents?I think if they had evidence to prove guilt they would have moved forward.IMO
I think if they had evidence to prove guilt they would have moved forward.IMO
According to the prosecutor it was dropped due to facts and I'm assuming that means lack of facts to support a case.And I pay for lottery tickets to support the local Cancer centre but it doesnt give me a free pass for crimes.