December
Verified insider - Kathy Jones case
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 2,550
- Reaction score
- 7,281
I have read most of the inquest PDF. I tell you, i wish the family had a lawyer at that thing. It is horrible to imagine being in their shoes.
I read the confession that was read out in court. So, the one guy called Frank in the confession is actually named Bill and was in jail during the relevant time period. So, obviously, Bennie just pulled that guy out of thin air.
What is troubling is Bennie claims they picked up the girls and partied with them for days including having sex regularly. But then they go parking and these girls he is talking about say no, therefore they both "accidentally killed" or maybe purposely killed. But, definitely raped for days because they weren't allowed to say no, ever. What the heck?
I don't believe that even this coroner, who kept going on about cookies and candy, would have missed such violations. As these poor girls were found naked, i believe the police present would have been able to see if they had been violated to that degree.
Also, i don't think the lawyer should have been allowed to repeatedly ask the family about this seedy side of town. How do they know where the girls might have been taken? They can only say the girls would not choose to go to such a place.
I do believe the family is right and these were decent young girls. So, it must have been incredibly heartbreaking for them to read about their little daughters being accused of hanging out in bars and shaking up with randos. At first, i thought maybe some witnesses saw some older girls in the bar until it got to the part about them being killed.
Bennie might have made up a story that he thought explained how somehow they wanted this and accident. But, just because the confession is just absurd doesn't mean he didn't have a hand in whatever actually happened.
This entire inquest is a mess. And it's obvious people are regularly being thrown out of the room. This is Chicago, a major city... I think I am seeing why some old crimes go unsolved.
I read the confession that was read out in court. So, the one guy called Frank in the confession is actually named Bill and was in jail during the relevant time period. So, obviously, Bennie just pulled that guy out of thin air.
What is troubling is Bennie claims they picked up the girls and partied with them for days including having sex regularly. But then they go parking and these girls he is talking about say no, therefore they both "accidentally killed" or maybe purposely killed. But, definitely raped for days because they weren't allowed to say no, ever. What the heck?
I don't believe that even this coroner, who kept going on about cookies and candy, would have missed such violations. As these poor girls were found naked, i believe the police present would have been able to see if they had been violated to that degree.
Also, i don't think the lawyer should have been allowed to repeatedly ask the family about this seedy side of town. How do they know where the girls might have been taken? They can only say the girls would not choose to go to such a place.
I do believe the family is right and these were decent young girls. So, it must have been incredibly heartbreaking for them to read about their little daughters being accused of hanging out in bars and shaking up with randos. At first, i thought maybe some witnesses saw some older girls in the bar until it got to the part about them being killed.
Bennie might have made up a story that he thought explained how somehow they wanted this and accident. But, just because the confession is just absurd doesn't mean he didn't have a hand in whatever actually happened.
This entire inquest is a mess. And it's obvious people are regularly being thrown out of the room. This is Chicago, a major city... I think I am seeing why some old crimes go unsolved.