branmuffin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 4,445
- Reaction score
- 39,614
Very true @5W's. Unfortunately, that was not what SB3932 proposed.
Instead of legislation to serve all the missing, including the underreported and their families, the bill wanted [Illinois] legislation that essentially removed NamUS as a program partner to facilitate prompt identification of human remains, but without answering why.
NamUs is funded and administered by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and managed through a contract with RTI International.
IMO, if a party takes issue with a partner that accepted factual information provided by LE that a missing person was located and/or identified (because the party did not want the missing yet located or wasn't emotionally ready to accept their loved one deceased), then I believe the motivation to suggest a longterm partner organization removed from existing legislation, at the expense of all the missing, should be questioned.
Just the same, if a party wants to promote a brand new or existing organization in Illinois to duplicate or replace services being provided by NamUS, dedicated especially to people of color, that is their right, but not at the expense of others being served by NamUS. MOO
There is already a website devoted to shining the spotlight on black and minority missing persons called Black and Missing. Here's the link:
I think it's true that many minorities are underreported. Unfortunately, that sometimes has to do with the fact that some minorities live marginalized lives and fall through the cracks. The reality, though, is that many people of all races live marginalized lives perhaps because they grew up in poverty and engaged in high risk lifestyles like prostitution and drug addiction.
In Canada, instead of black people who are underreported it's indigenous people, mostly women, who weren't reported missing or if they were, they already had records for prostitution or other charges and were treated callously by LE. It could be a defeatist attitude by family members who feel their voices are never heard and think, based on experience, that a drug addicted daughter is going to be low on the list of priorities.
There is a section of highway in British Columbia, about 700 km which is called the Highway of Tears because of the number of women found brutally murdered since 1970, with a disproportionate amount of indigenous women who were already estranged from family.
Highway of Tears - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's a fact that here on WS, almost every UID I have followed or been interested in were never reported missing by family members or even people who they were close to. If family did report them missing they were told the missing person was an adult free to disappear. The police did not take their concerns seriously and refused to follow up or dragged their feet entering them as bona fide missing persons.
So my personal opinion is, if you are someone like Gabby Petito who was plastered all over the media people take notice. Many people who go missing are dismissed subconsciously when the only image available is a mug shot. I think Gabby having such a high profile had less to do with her being white, and more to do with the fact that she appeared to have a stable homelife, a long term boyfriend, good relations with family with healthy goals and no criminal offenses in her life. Basically the girl next door. Whereas the reality is, she stayed with an abusive individual who basically programmed her to be submissive and defer to his outbursts. And we all know the way that ended.