I don't know what, if any, role KAK plays into the Delphi case, but those of us who have kept open to the possibility have been denigrated for it. I never would have even looked at KAK if the ISP hadn't brought a_shots to our attention, twice, and within the last several months. If DC hadn't said that the a_shots/KAK line of investigation had gleaned them new investigative leads. If BP and KG hadn't confirmed L was, in fact, communicating with a_shots. If the same two Delphi investigators hadn't also interviewed KAK about Delphi. If Prosecutor McL hadn't replied to a question about the K's involvement with "it's part of the investigation." IMO, being "part of the investigation" doesn't have to mean KAK was on the trails or bridge that day, and maybe his single only role in any of it was that he created the fake profile. IDK. Only a couple days ago, though, the ISP said this about KAK:
At this time, we are looking for any information about the “anthony_shots” profile and anyone who may have had contact with that profile. The case that you are referring to is a separate child *advertiser censored* case. (link below)
If the ISP is still interested in a_shots for the Delphi case (separate from KAK's CSAM case), then why can't I be? IMO, a_shots is a separate entity from KAK, because at this point we don't know who else was using the account. JMO. And in the end, if it has nothing to do with anything, it won't make a bit of difference to me as long as A and L get justice.
https://www.wthr.com/article/news/c...pped/531-73f11581-6eb2-4c44-a646-f70a0e794169