iamnotagolem
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 5,743
- Reaction score
- 17,141
I don’t think there was any tip. I think it’s as simple as the article states. Someone new that didn’t have a preconceived idea of who murdered the girls looked at the case file and followed procedure.
I’m guessing they started at the beginning to verify who was at the trails that day and checked them out one by one. They likely saw that RA was there, admitted to being on the bridge and no follow up was done.
I assume from there they started investigating him as a potential suspect since he said he was on the bridge, he resembles BG and probably didn’t even offer an alibi.
At that point maybe they got discarded DNA to test against a CS sample and had probable cause to search his house.
I’m guessing they started at the beginning to verify who was at the trails that day and checked them out one by one. They likely saw that RA was there, admitted to being on the bridge and no follow up was done.
I assume from there they started investigating him as a potential suspect since he said he was on the bridge, he resembles BG and probably didn’t even offer an alibi.
At that point maybe they got discarded DNA to test against a CS sample and had probable cause to search his house.