Yes, and I guess it depends. He may not have been acting weird at all at that time and to my understanding there are platforms all the way to the end so he could have been just standing there, seemingly minding his own business while they passed.Would they have crossed with somebody in front of them though?
I would walk that bridge without any fear but if I had a strange man in front of me acting suspicious then I wouldn’t start to cross. Coz I have seen way to many horror movies
Dnr is the title of the department conservation officers work for.… again at least in indiana. Until this fact about the Delphi case was released I’ve never in my life heard them called conservation officers. In my work we would refer to them as dnr officers and in popular vernacular you would just say oh that’s dnr. It’s the department of natural resources.
MS went over those items one-by-one. Many were standard but a few were pretty interesting. MS didn't seem to have any solid feel for the unusual ones = whether the atty was just covering any and all bases or if they were specific to this case.
art19.com
I'm not particularly adept in interpreting legal language, but I feel like items 5 and 6 might be the defense looking for discovery evidence related to NMcL's claim of "other actors." Thoughts?
Appreciate that you posted Heavy link. Imo, they usually provide informative and helpful information, and avoid fluff.
If the girls passed him on the platform then he might have said " GUYS " as a salutation ( that I have always thought it was). His voice sounds more lifted then down. JMO
I finally listened. Again, I'm not well-versed in legal language, but I don't think I agree with MS's interpretation of item 5. I don't think the defense is expecting evidence showing the murders happened on behalf of the state, or anything like that. I think it's asking for evidence showing that someone who participated (and they don't say "allegedly participated") in the alleged crime worked on behalf of the state in an informant capacity. JMO.MS went over those items one-by-one. Many were standard but a few were pretty interesting. MS didn't seem to have any solid feel for the unusual ones = whether the atty was just covering any and all bases or if they were specific to this case.
The 2 mentions of a confidential informant kind of tripped MS trigger. Also anyone acting undercover or jailhouse snitches. The mention of a grand jury (#8) = MS said they had not heard any mention of a GJ. #16 the suggestion of a search after the arrest, which we know nothing about. MS discussion of rule 404 was informative, talking about the ways in which it could be used.
Murder Sheet
The Murder Sheet is a weekly true crime podcast hosted by journalist Áine Cain and attorney Kevin Greenlee. We take a journalistic approach to covefing true crime. We have broken national news on major cases, like the Delphi murders and the Burger Chef murders. We also cover plenty of other...
That sounds reasonable. This is such odd wording that it's hard to know exactly what he means. Maybe he did mean to say "indirectly on the investigation...". instead of at the investigation.
That's what I think. And the very next item, number 6, seems like an extension on the idea of an informant, going on to ask for anything showing what the informant got in return for their cooperation (payment, altered jail time, etc). Jmo.
We shan't kill the messenger, Lord @raja !
Correct -- was someone an agent for the state at some point is the question. For example, when a co-conspirator is trying to get someone to confess they are acting as an agent of the state
LE planting evidence makes no sense, IMO.
I agree, if they planted evidence from RA I don’t think it would have taken them 5.5 years to remember they were setting up someone to take the fall.
RA's defense team is not going to claim anybody planted the bullet; they're going to dispute the claim that it's his bullet—period—in my opinion. Experts challenge ballistics evidence all the time, and there is not nearly the same body of research behind this kind of identification as there is behind ballistics matches with bullets that have actually been fired.
