Falling Down
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 2,191
- Reaction score
- 12,538
JMO, another piece of compelling evidence against RA is the fact he went to the bridge at the exact time the girls had scheduled a meet up with the "catfishing" creep on Snapchat. Add to the fact he looked like the sketch, looked like the guy seen wearing bloody clothes, etc.
Jurors do pay attention to digital evidence these days. It's too much of a coincidence that he appeared on the bridge, looking like the killer at the exact time the girls had scheduled a meeting. JMO, that evidence exceeds the "reasonable doubt" test.
Glad you brought this up.
For a long time I've thought in order for the DA to get a conviction, they would have to place the perp at the bridge at the time the girls were there. Not only did RA do that with the DNR agent early on, which unfortunately got buried under everything else, he admitted in recent times to LE he was there, and that he was wearing clothing similar to BG. Guess I'm still shocked he volunteered this info, but at any rate, like I've said it was a normal work day for most people in that general area. BG appeared to be a working age person, which that alone narrows down possible suspects when process of elimination is applied in a case.
JMO