MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,223
OK so the worst fears are true
This is why you don't force counsel to resign back of house.
Judge Gull had more than enough reason to remove Baldwin from the case. She should have ordered so in public court with reasoning. Baldwin could argue or not, or claim it was all prejudicial
Now Judge Gull made a huge mess and the defence will grandstand
I don’t know if you watched The Prosectors youtube interview of Cain and Greenlee but all the attorneys said they professionally knew it to be very common for the P, D and judge to meet in chambers to discuss business prior to upcoming hearings. So it might’ve been as a courtesy the judge intended to forewarn the D with the issues (R acknowledges she intended to reveal during open court) , instead it didn’t happen since he perceived it as a “public shaming”. The judge can’t be blamed for it not happening because the D balked.
But the issues relating to “gross negligence” still remain.
Last edited: