ab01
Ooh Rah
- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 3,818
- Reaction score
- 34,595
There is at least one connection to the girls in that he took their lives.
Agreed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is at least one connection to the girls in that he took their lives.
Also I believe there is a huge difference in news media reporting that one of the victims had made a specific about going to the location where they would ultimately be murdered and reporting on what specific social media accounts the girls had.
Hence I still don't believe a specific post was ever made
JMO
I think one of the girls was 5’4” (maybe 5’3”) and the other 5’5”/150lbs so they weren’t physically that little. If BG is 5’8” - 5’10”/180-200lbs they weren't that outmatched in size. Plus, they were both athletes. If they fought it was a heck of a fight. They also were both into law enforcement. It’s hard for me to see them compliantly and silently being abducted and allowing BG to do what he wanted even if he was armed. Not saying that didn’t happen it’s just so odd.
Unless such a post was public, would the media have been able to read it? If Libby had a FB account what name was it under? How many friends? All questions we don’t have the answer to.
I’m not insisting there was a social media connection, just that there’s not enough information to know one way or another.
I’ve been reading vintage crime stories recently, and this particular one caught my eye, as it very similar.
It happened in 1865, in the woods just outside of Boston.
A brother (age 12) and sister (14-15) were exploring, when they were attacked by a man wielding a knife.
The girl was the main target, as she was sexually assaulted before she was killed. Her brother tried to run, but he was also stabbed to death.
The killer was never caught.
https://www.google.com/amp/jamaicaplaingazette.com/2012/07/20/unsolved-murders-that-haunt-jp/amp/
A little off topic but... believe I stumbled upon Websleuths in the Isabel C. Days. I live in Arizona and followed it from the beginning until the end, as many people in Arizona did. I was convinced her father was somehow involved. I was very wrong. I was one of many who were very wrong. One of the most helpful things I have found when looking at cases since then, is to assume I am wrong and that everything I am sure of is wrong.
It's a very small force, an older Chief, a sergeant and 5 very young
fellows.
According to violent crime reports I've seen, other than assaults,
they have zero experience with investigating murders the last few years. It seems like a sleepy little town.
Interestingly Indiana State Police does not report their clearance
(solving) rates in the crime statistics report for last few years.
It takes experienced, educated investigators and competent forensic people to solve crimes and convict criminals. These small towns are at
a distinct disadvantage, IMO.
My theory:
If the police really KNOW that the killer lived in or was closely connected to Delphi;
Then I strongly believe that:
The killers motive was to silence one of the girls.
That one of the girls had knowledge about the killer that could destroy his life.
That the girl had threatened to tell.
The killer knew the girl would be at the trail/park like overheard someone close to he girl.
The killer used MO that made it look like a different kind of murder than it actually was.
The killer participated in the search, and maybe was part of the group at the crime scene.
I just don't believe that a person connected to that small community would choose to commit a sick and sadistic fantasy driven violent sexual double murder in his own small town were people know him.
As to my original post many threads back
This would be public knowledge, just look at all the posts that get screenshotted from facebook friends and posted all over the interwebs in various instances.
If such a post ever existed it would not be a secret and some media would have picked up on it very quickly
And if it did exist I believe we would currently be discussing a specific individual who is currently in prison and was found guilty of this crime long ago
I don't think such a post exists
JMO
And what knowledge do you think one of the girls could possibly have that would destroy his life and lead to their murder? I’m curious. I’ve never bought into that theory. It sounds a little too TV-ish to me. JMO.My theory:
If the police really KNOW that the killer lived in or was closely connected to Delphi;
Then I strongly believe that:
The killers motive was to silence one of the girls.
That one of the girls had knowledge about the killer that could destroy his life.
That the girl had threatened to tell.
The killer knew the girl would be at the trail/park like overheard someone close to he girl.
The killer used MO that made it look like a different kind of murder than it actually was.
The killer participated in the search, and maybe was part of the group at the crime scene.
I just don't believe that a person connected to that small community would choose to commit a sick and sadistic fantasy driven violent sexual double murder in his own small town were people know him.
In Carter's most recent interview (yesterday) he indicated that he was 100% positive BG watched the April 22nd presser from 'close by'. I hope he's right, but how can he be so sure? What do you think is most likely:
1. LE has BG under surveillance, and their intelligence suggests that BG watched or reacted to the presser in some way.
2. LE is going off profiling in their confidence that an offender like BG would have watched the presser, so they assume he did.
3. LE really have no idea if BG saw the presser, but are playing cat-and-mouse with him and trying to rattle him in case he did watch the presser.
4. LE received a tip from the public that indicates that BG saw the presser.
5. Other???
In my opinion, one or both yelled screamed at least once. A gun was probably used to threaten them to go down the hill. Early on I asked my teen girls if they would leave a friend and run for help, they both said no. They would stick it out and fight and scream. I'm betting they did, but they were just two little girls ...Praying everyday for an arrest
In Carter's most recent interview (yesterday) he indicated that he was 100% positive BG watched the April 22nd presser from 'close by'. I hope he's right, but how can he be so sure? What do you think is most likely:
1. LE has BG under surveillance, and their intelligence suggests that BG watched or reacted to the presser in some way.
2. LE is going off profiling in their confidence that an offender like BG would have watched the presser, so they assume he did.
3. LE really have no idea if BG saw the presser, but are playing cat-and-mouse with him and trying to rattle him in case he did watch the presser.
4. LE received a tip from the public that indicates that BG saw the presser.
5. Other???
My guess would be off profiling, but also with the assumption that most anyone who hasn't been caught after committing murder probably watches the case just to know if LE is getting close? JMOIn Carter's most recent interview (yesterday) he indicated that he was 100% positive BG watched the April 22nd presser from 'close by'. I hope he's right, but how can he be so sure? What do you think is most likely:
1. LE has BG under surveillance, and their intelligence suggests that BG watched or reacted to the presser in some way.
2. LE is going off profiling in their confidence that an offender like BG would have watched the presser, so they assume he did.
3. LE really have no idea if BG saw the presser, but are playing cat-and-mouse with him and trying to rattle him in case he did watch the presser.
4. LE received a tip from the public that indicates that BG saw the presser.
5. Other???
I think they are going solely off what the profile says, as we know that killers like this, tend to follow the case closely.In Carter's most recent interview (yesterday) he indicated that he was 100% positive BG watched the April 22nd presser from 'close by'. I hope he's right, but how can he be so sure? What do you think is most likely:
1. LE has BG under surveillance, and their intelligence suggests that BG watched or reacted to the presser in some way.
2. LE is going off profiling in their confidence that an offender like BG would have watched the presser, so they assume he did.
3. LE really have no idea if BG saw the presser, but are playing cat-and-mouse with him and trying to rattle him in case he did watch the presser.
4. LE received a tip from the public that indicates that BG saw the presser.
5. Other???
I don’t think that’s it, because they probably wouldn’t want him to know he was under surveillance.I'm going with #1. At least that is my hope.
Do you think he's the type to run if LE does get close?I think they are going solely off what the profile says, as we know that killers like this, tend to follow the case closely.
They do this for two main reasons:
Some of them enjoy it, as it gives them a sense of power.
They want to know what law enforcement knows about them, and where the investigation stands (self preservation).