A few random thoughts:
I’ve been thinking about the comment re: “twist...never seen anything like it in 30 years of my career”...(paraphrasing, if you need exact quote I’ll pull it, please ask
)
What on earth could that be? The “thirty years in my career” is making this seem even more dramatic, for lack of a better term at the moment.
Some of these statements are just like, as
@skibaboo uses the phrase, “dangling carrots”...if you can’t tell us then why refer to it...
My mind has gone to all kinds of places about this. What could be such a twist that not even LE has ever seen?
Is it something to do with the signature?
Or could it be something as simple as “there was no SA”, so that in itself would be rare considering the victim’s were female? (I doubt that’s it moo)
I know we’ve talked about the “twist” before, but was it with reference to “in my thirty year career” as well? Maybe I missed that or forgot.
I’m sure that’s been mentioned somewhere.
I’d like to see a side by side of the two different quotes re: “twist”, if I am indeed correctly recalling that there are two separate quotes.
—-
Another thought which I mentioned when we first heard the audio of “guys”...how bad is it that they can only get one more word from that.
It must be really graphic.
I’m thinking about, again, the cold SK case I’m working on and one of the SA victims talked about the really vulgar language the perp used during the attack. I’m wondering about this here now.
—-