Guns are called equalizers for a reason. anyone with gun and the obvious mental state and proximity to use it can command anyone of any athleticism to follow commands.Do we think KK is physically capable of committing this crime? If we believe KK committed these crimes alone, then we have to also believe that BG is not the killer and has nothing to do with the crime, because there is no way KK is BG.
Which brings up interesting questions/facts to speculate on (yes some of these are very pedestrian and seemingly canonized and referred to as solved/definitive by followers of the case, but on closer inspection the details are not that clear IMO, or are open to interpretation, or there have been changes overtime by LE regarding their official stance, LE agencies contradicted each other, etc.)
Many more but that's more than enough for now.
- This is one of the only cases, if not the only case, I have ever followed that included multiple composite sketches that were never clearly elaborated on by investigators. Are we supposed to disregard one of the sketches? Are we supposed to keep both in mind and look for individuals that fall somewhere in the middle of the two sketches appearance wise? Why was the first sketch inaccurate? Why was there a need for a second sketch?
- Which brings me to -- five years later and how many thousands of leads, and we haven't been told if LE suspects one killer, or more than one person. This makes sense if LE, smartly so, wants to withhold to confirm a confession later on. If they want to surprise one killer by saying, for example, "listen, we know you didn't do this by yourself ... so we will give you one chance to tell the truth, because the other guy is talking". And we know from the recently released interrogation transcript, investigators are doing just that with KK and his father. Did they suspect two people all along? What could have given them that impression?
- What are the odds that Libby was talking to a child predator, possibly two child predators using the same catfish account, and then is brutally murdered the next day? Sure there are always outliers to statistics, but seriously what are the odds?!
I personally didn't think much of KK as a suspect for the longest time. He's obviously not BG. I don't think he is physically capable of murdering two athletic young teens. I didn't think his "circle" was sophisticated enough or matched the profile I had developed in my head and with the help of sleuthing friends. That being said, his father sure seems to have been smart enough to set him up to take the fall.
MOO considering the scrambled imagery they said they need to to unravel, perhaps the video result giving a height of around 5’9” for BG was not true.
3 inches dropped from to his 6ft is about a 4% error.
motion and parallax might have messed with the different focal planes and foreshortened BG.
I have alsways thought he was taller as he has a taller man’s foot, his shoes have pronounced toe boxes.