jjhoward33
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2017
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 3
Let's talk about why this killer left the girls in an area where they'd be easily discovered, and didn't take or destroy the cell phone.
Even if he didn't have much time, he could have easily hidden them to make it more difficult to find them. Leaving them out in the open seems to say the killer doesn't care about them being found. It also implies he didn't have a personal relationship with them. I've heard Jim Clemente say several times that a murderer who has a personal relationship with the victim will cover the victim or bury the victim.
He left the phone. He almost certainly had to have known Libby had a phone. To me this seems like more evidence that he wanted the girls found soon. He probably didn't realize there was video of him on the phone - or like the killer of Missy Bevers, didn't care.
So, thoughts?
My opinion is he left them because of two reasons: no time to hide them (either he heard their ride calling for them, was afraid someone would come, or he knew (maybe they said we have to go meet our ride pleading with him) they'd be looking soon), AND he realized he couldn't or drag two bodies very far to hide them.
In re to the phone, I really think it's someone who is somewhat oblivious to technology. Not that they don't know it exists but there really are people left in this world (few, but there still are some imo) who it probably wouldn't even cross their mind of a phone and how it could have come in to play like it did. Which leads me to believe this may have been his first time. I have a few friends whose dads (late 50's early 60's) don't use email unless absolutely necessary and their cell phones are like the old Nokia kind.
All in my opinion of course
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk