Right....but was RL's property searched that night??
Yes, but not carefully. More listening than looking.
Right....but was RL's property searched that night??
can I ask, what or who is BG?Scent dogs need a scent to follow. Unless they had something belonging to the perp, what would the dog track?
100% this.I think we are all in "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks" mode.
Ok just had a thought, posting on my phone w dog poop in m hand, way upstream tocya had posted old google earth images of the area and it had police tape, I'm assuming for some sort of land surveying purposes....maybe does this kind of work, land surveying, or tree trimming...again, who is responsible for maintaining the trails grounds, etc...
Are there any similarities to these two missing IN girls? I know a number of us feel this wasn't his first rodeo.
Lauren and Emily Stratton
http://www.missingkids.com/poster/NCMC/1285083/1
Wrong case.Here's the thread. Thread # 36 about their case.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...yric-Cook-10-Evansdale-13-July-2012-37/page74
You'll find quite a few ties.
I still don;t think they crossed the creek. I think he passed them on the bridge, turned around and walked back and caught them on the north side of the bridge. Then went into the woods to the right and then down the hill to the flat section in front of the creek.
This is what I was thinking the other night, as there are caches in cemeteries. Maybe this was a new cache. Maybe this was where a SM contact was supposed to be. But that convo has been moved on from, I guess.
I still don;t think they crossed the creek. I think he passed them on the bridge, turned around and walked back and caught them on the north side of the bridge. Then went into the woods to the right and then down the hill to the flat section in front of the creek.
Wrong case.
I was asking about Lauren and Emily Stratton. They disappeared from IN relatively recently.
He could've said there is a new cache somewhere I suppose but I don't think so. The cache at the south end of the bridge has been there 7 yrs. I don't think the person that hid all the area caches is the BG. That person has been geocaching for 10yrs and placed 25 over that period of time all in the general area and now he decides to do something this horrific?
Maybe it's related to geocaching but I just don't think so. I agree all avenues have to be looked at though
I would say that The US Constitution is of utmost importance.
Rumors are not probable cause. Probable cause is evidence.
No evidence = unlawful.
He didn't hide the bodies because he most likely was going to return to them , organized anti-social sk usually do this. Think Ted BundyBack in #12 where the question is discussed why he wouldn't have tried to hide the bodies. Some mentioned for shock value which is imo a good point.
So, what if this isn't the first time he has done this and he wants the attention, wants the excitement and the thrill of it. So, he goes to a smaller town that he is familiar with and looks for a person, in this case two who he can easily handle.
He now has the attention and excitement he has been hoping for; unfortunately, he got a little more than anticpated..... the recordings.
As a frequent snapper, I wanted to chime in that snapchat flips(or mirrors) photos. So when looking at the maps and how some are saying it doesn't make sense that the suspect came from the south...has that been confirmed or just what is speculated based on pictures? Because he very well couldn't of been coming from the north because of how snapchat reverses image so