liltexans
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 13,451
- Reaction score
- 25,918
I agree with you. Where I live someone was identified in a crime by the way they saw them walk on camera.
Welcome to Websleuths!
:welcome:
I agree with you. Where I live someone was identified in a crime by the way they saw them walk on camera.
Maybe why he addressed it in a round-about-way?
I think pacifier is the perfect word for this.
Yep, it's happened twice now that media sensationalized or got something out of context. Can you say "clickbait"?
Both times iirc it was channel 59 ("today is the day" and DNA found.) LE said in another interview that channel 59 producer called to apologize. That is why I view Alexis https://twitter.com/AlexisMcAdamsTV/status/839600041207672832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw through filtered eyes on her posts on twitter at channel 59.
:moo:
Emily Longnecker‏
@EmilyWTHR
Follow
More
Investigators says murder case out of Iowa in 2012 of 2 young girls is coincidence. They have no evidence this case is connected to that one
Sorry, don't know how to do the tweet thing
IMO the worst click bait article in this whole story came at the beginning, a couple of days in, when a site - I think it was that 59 site but can't be sure - had a headline that said DELPHI SUSPECT IDENTIFIED.
of course what the article said was "man on bridge identified as suspect in the double homicide".
It takes training to know to repeat the question.
I too was unsure with that statement.
Are they dupes, or are they next in queue for priority purposes.
A question perhaps a good journalist will follow up.. perhaps a tweet to them to ask for those that do twitter as he said he would be available for questions after the presser.
They have nothing! I just find it incredibly frustrating! Libby had such a presence of mind to give them photos, audio and whatever else....and still they have zero! I can only imagine how the family feels! Prayers to the family and investigators!
Did anyone ask if youths in the community are considered at risk? Should they be allowed outdoors without direct supervision? A brazen child killer is on the loose, after all. Should people be hyper vigilant? Lack of information is often the most telling. I sense urgency for justice on behalf of the girls but I'm not necessarily sensing it for the safety of the public as a whole? ‎
This is ALL JMO but I've felt since the onset this was a revenge type of killing where one of the girls was targeted [for reasons unknown] the other was collateral damage. I don't think it was sexually motivated or related to other unsolved homicides. I also sensed the girls didn't know the perp but may have felt he was vaguely familiar (aka not a complete/total stranger.) I don't think they sensed imminent danger as he approached, nor when he was being voice recorded but I do think the voice recording commenced after they became creeped out [for whatever reason.] *‎