alexwood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 8,138
- Reaction score
- 25,052
Not to mention that at the time he approached them, the girls were on public property. The rail bridge was not only never owned by RL, but has also been signed over to the city by the rail company.
In addition, there is no indication that the girls even trespassed on property he owned ( the apparent path behind the cemetery). If RL was that angry about trespassers or if he had "claimed" portions of the public trail, I strongly suspect that he would of had previous encounters with other hikers and these people would have phoned the police about him following the murders.
Sadly, I think that if RL is BG, he approached the girls as an acquaintance, perhaps with a half-baked plan to initiate some kind of sexual encounter. The girls resist, then he panics and murders them.
I don't know . . . in broad daylight? I mean, I know that the murders did occur IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, but I just don't see the property owner up there on the bridge and/or hiking trail. Seems like he has too much to do on his 40 acres to be out strolling "getting some exercise"!
I hope I am right!
[Although I may be eating some crow, later, baked into a humble pie!]
:cow: