You are right-it is 6, so sorry!I though special was 6 but I could be wrong. Thank you for that link though I had no clue about a pc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are right-it is 6, so sorry!I though special was 6 but I could be wrong. Thank you for that link though I had no clue about a pc.
It looked different to me as well. 5pm and I believe the recorded special is at 7?
Hunting for victims. I think that the perpetrator(s) have killed before and I think the perpetrator(s) will kill again. My working theory is that the perpetrator(s) have hunted previously near university campuses where there is a greater concentration of younger women. With Purdue not far away in Lafayette my working theory is that the perpetrator(s) had hunted there over the weekend and for whatever reason were unable to obtain the right circumstances or right victim(s) - possibly an encounter with LE that did not result in an arrest.Hunting as in for victims?
If so, then why there? Do you think any random person would suffice?
They were just young teens not streetwise women yet. IMO they seemed so cute and sweet and he was sure they probably did not have mace or a knife to fight back.Libby was a large girl and appears to me anyway, to be stocky and muscular.
Add another girl to the mix and how do they become vulnerable?
Not saying you're wrong.
Interesting to see how easily a vehicle is hidden parked in the daytime at the rear of cemetery. Nightime even more so I would imagine. Thanks for posting Lilowlet. Very informative.Thank you EmmaRose! Here's the link to the vid I watched. I'll say the vids imo It's not much other than someone parking and walking til you don't see the car.
https://youtu.be/h31qtZICEjE
They were just young teens not streetwise women yet. IMO they seemed so cute and sweet and he was sure they probably did not have mace or a knife to fight back.
Thanks I get it but I guess I still look at them just as 2 kids. Who knows what he or they were thinking. Whoever did this is just evil and mean and I think he felt he could get away with it. Hope the PC tonight has some good news. Seems since it was not scheduled earlier this week maybe there is a new development they can share.Want to clarify in case it was misunderstood. I agree they are cute and sweet and that's not what I meant by pointing out Libby's physical traits. It was more that this is someone who could be determined to be strong and would fight back.
I am a bit torn between the murders being specifically planned or just being planned in general and therefore opportunistic by nature. In other words, do you think the girls - or one of them - was being stalked? Or do you think the POI/BG was scouting for a victim/ victims in general and just happened to run into the girls?
-Nin
You are right-it is 6, so sorry!
Yes, this is what I'm leaning towards for awhile. Perhaps their escape was across the creek and that's how they were there? Don't know yet.Just an idea in my head, I think one was specifically targeted and a poorly planned abduction was to occur but the two stuck together and refused to cooperate. Maybe they attempted to flee and were executed in doing so:-( because the perp was angered and it left no witnesses to the failed intentions.
But just to mention, I noticed in the FBI list of things that might prompt people to call in a tip, no where was it mentioned the suspect might bear scratches or wounds from that date. So I don't think there was a physical battle, no DNA under fingernails etc. Likely the perp used a gun. Several of the mentioned 13 SWs may have been to obtain guns in an attempt to match unique markings, ie bullet forensics.
I think he was in a 30-40 age range, a loner, mentally unstable but not enough to be recognized by another.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Interesting to see how easily a vehicle is hidden parked in the daytime at the rear of cemetery. Nightime even more so I would imagine. Thanks for posting Lilowlet. Very informative.
You are correct. All of our local news stations are airing the 5:00 news conference. I believe they are also sharing info on upcoming events for the community to help in the healing and morale of our area. There is a walk on the trail planned and a local band is putting on a concert. I have seen the promo for the 5:00 news conference on several different channels. None of them mention LE speaking (as far as I have seen). The 7:00 special on channel 6 is different and appears to be pre-recorded. Channel 6 is WRTV.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I think he gambled, and I feel he lost it with the video and audio of him. He can no longer hide forever, and he can be proven guilty once found. I don't think the phone evidence was expected. His motive and reasoning I can't reckon very well. In other words once the attack began, the events happened as they occurred. Pls are never foolproof. He couldn't foresee the whole circumstance ahead of time. He gambled. He had to have known something of the area ahead of time. He planned his escape. He waited until the girls crossed the bridge and cornered them. He walked them down and at the creek, I think they fled. Somewhere he lost control, and he left without searching the bodies after he caught them. Problem is one at a time went down. The second one witnessed the first. That kind of monster.Want to clarify in case it was misunderstood. I agree they are cute and sweet and that's not what I meant by pointing out Libby's physical traits. It was more that this is someone who could be determined to be strong and would fight back.
I think it's because that is how the victim's bodies would have been treated by someone who took their lives in the first place.
But how about "abandoned"? As in, "The killer abandoned the bodies at such and such location."
I think he gambled, and I feel he lost it with the video and audio of him. He can no longer hide forever, and he can be proven guilty once found. I don't think the phone evidence was expected. His motive and reasoning I can't reckon very well. In other words once the attack began, the events happened as they occurred. Pls are never foolproof. He couldn't foresee the whole circumstance ahead of time. He gambled. He had to have known something of the area ahead of time. He planned his escape. He waited until the girls crossed the bridge and cornered them. He walked them down and at the creek, I think they fled. Somewhere he lost control, and he left without searching the bodies after he caught them. Problem is one at a time went down. The second one witnessed the first. That kind of monster.
I am just raising this question, because the killer may not be as smart? Is he smart at all? A risk taker? A gambler? A controller? A violent person? A smooth talker? An organized person?
What is he and who is he?
-Nin
sociopathiclatest thought: He maybe a "family patriarch", much too young to be one, troubled anyway along his grow up, with a teenager daughter at home which he is laboriously trying not to harm. Instead of harming someone of his own family he walks the trails, drives the streets, stalks females via sm to find another victim to his compulsive impulses. Dependent on his mood and sex drive it maybe very urgent this day and less urgent another day.