Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The autopsies were completed on the 15th.
Fair enough. But we don't know when the family was given the information nor when they gave the information to the funeral home. The Death Certifcate is not immediately issued or available until long after after its filed with the State, is that correct?
I stated it in the post. One of the obits has the 14th as the date so that is the evidence.
That's not evidence at all though & I don't understand why it's still being referred to as "evidence". The obituary dates have been covered many, many, many times throughout these threads - including this thread within the past 24hrs. It's also come up repeatedly in almost every online conversation on this case since 14 Feb. Every time it does people explain step by step that obituary dates can be whatever families want them to be.
It is EXTREMELY COMMON in missing persons cases for some families to choose the date of disappearance, for others to choose the date they were located & yet others choose something else entirely. Some go with the official date, others can't bear to use anything but the date they first felt in their hearts & minds that their loved one was really gone. It has nothing to do with official govt record keeping.
Members who have ACTUAL PERSONAL EXPERIENCE of obituaries for missing & murdered family & friends have shared their stories throughout these threads to try & help people see that the obituary dates are not the hard & fast "clue" that many people suppose them to be. People who have worked with obituaries have also shared their personal experiences to try & explain this.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to police anyone's ideas, it's 100% ok if people want to theorise about the dates. BUT ... it needs to be recognised that these are just personal theories & at this time these theories have no basis in fact. It's just supposition based on assumption. Nothing more.
For the sake of these families & other families of the missing & murdered it's really important that people understand that obituary dates are not official death dates, sometimes they're not death dates at all - & that's the only thing relating to obituary dates that can be called a fact (unless there is other incontrovertible proof).
(& re other proof, it will never come from debates over the meaning of the word "killed". In the context that it was used in the autopsy suppression documents for this case, the wordhas one meaning only)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...wo-girls-a-chilling-recording-of-three-words/I read in an article very early on in the case that LE wanted info on a man with his right hand in his pocket, among other things. Does anyone else recall this?
Could investigators know this was a habit of BG's, or have knowledge that he had cuts on his right hand? TIA.
Just wanted to bring it up because it has bothered me, especially when I could not find the link. (And felt funny posting about this without one.)
I read in an article very early on in the case that LE wanted info on a man with his right hand in his pocket, among other things. Does anyone else recall this?
Could investigators know this was a habit of BG's, or have knowledge that he had cuts on his right hand? TIA.
Just wanted to bring it up because it has bothered me, especially when I could not find the link. (And felt funny posting about this without one.)
Would an autopsy be able to determine if a female homicide victim (teenager) of a SA had been raped or been SAed at any other time before the crime and how long before? https://www.universalclass.com/articles/law/autopsy-and-wound-anatomy.htm
Just wondering....
Would an autopsy be able to determine if a female homicide victim (teenager) of a SA had been raped or been SAed at any other time before the crime and how long before? https://www.universalclass.com/articles/law/autopsy-and-wound-anatomy.htm
Just wondering....
Could you explain this scenario please ?What do we gain as sleuthers by acquiescing to this "life after death" scenario?
Fair enough. But we don't know when the family was given the information nor when they gave the information to the funeral home. The Death Certifcate is not immediately issued or available until long after after its filed with the State, is that correct?
In the case of sudden and tragic death of a child, to the family the horror of Abby's death would likely supersede the need for exact specifics.
A published obituary is not a legal document.
I was just asking if I'm being asked to assume someone is not dead when they've been killed what is my motivation for doing so?Could you explain this scenario please ?
Here's the award winning article about this case. I highly recommend it.
http://reprints.longform.org/angels-demons