MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,234
I agree --- they have always been extremely cautious in how they speak about the video and audio, keeping them separate.
They say she was a hero "to have enough presence of mind to activate that video system on her cellphone, to record what we believe is criminal behavior that's about to occur." They are being artfully vague as to not let the killer(s) know exactly what and how much information and audio they have, as well as to keep the public from learning exactly how they went about obtaining it.
The fact that it wasn't released until the 22nd, more than a week after the murders, makes me feel it took them awhile to get it.
The digital and social media component of this investigation is what I obsess about most -- how was she able to record audio in a moment of such grave danger? If I felt threatened, I think my first response would be not to fumble around with my phone to try and record a video or audio, but to make a call for help and/or to notify someone, anyone, about where I was and that I was in trouble. This is why I can see the audio being extracted from something like google voice data as she maybe had her phone in her pocket and was pressing her home button and activating Siri or the emergency call feature. I just wonder what information they were able to get from her cellphone, and exactly how they got it.
I wonder about cell phone information too. This is comment about DNA and cellphones[/] being a big part of this case, although why his expectations aren't being met that the case is solved by now isn't clear.
Libby's cellphone and her recordings are known, but no mention if Abby had one with her as well. Because of the plural cellphones, I tend to think she did.
I go back before DNA and cell phones, said Ives who remembered prosecuting criminal cases in Carroll County with less evidence than in this case since 1987, and I certainly would have said, if experienced investigators, as we have in this case, had the evidence that was available in this case, I would expect them to solve it within a month. Thats without DNA and cell phones which are a big part of whats going on here."
http://fox59.com/2017/03/14/prosecu...r-received-crucial-tip-due-to-scope-of-probe/
The science of voice recognition has been proven to be somewhat unreliable so I wonder if evidence leads to some type of online stalking or unusual online communication.
I don't have a source but not long ago I recall headlines regarding issues relating to unlocking of Apple products. Other times certain online sites have fought subpoenas in court, over the right to protect their users. Just my opinion, but LE may be waiting on something related to cell phone evidence as well.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk