I don't know. That's why I am asking. Perhaps they are asking his lawyer where he has been checking in since May ? He absconded for a reason and I guess they want to know why. Alternatively, they could be advising they are going to extradite him and asking for a response within 30 days.
I think a Motion to Compel Discovery is simply the court wanting information and establishing a deadline for a response. That's my guess.
Not if he knows he is in custody and could get some reward. :smile:
I stated, way back when, that a large part of RL's trouble is living alone out in the country on land trying to maintain it and horses, etc. As soon as he started getting busted for DWI and had his license suspended he set himself up to be suspectible for a the possibility of becoming involved with unsavory or even criminal folks. He would either always need a ride or drive illegally, or need to hire someone who he may not know all that well. That is IF he was not associated with that element previously. He seems to have made his own bed, <modsnip> it is an easy step for many to hang out in a bar for companionship but it is a slippery slope. He faces the same dilemma now, going home for the remainder of his sentence. He will either need to move near public transportation or hire someone to drive him or else he will be back in the same boat.
He did not appear in court on 5/29. He was picked up on 4/25 and they entered it on 5/29.
I sort of feel like they helped him out on that Greenwood stop Driving while suspended and Paraphernalia on 4/25 because of his pregnant wife and he was in the PDP up to that point. But for some reason they did not enter the infraction until 5/29. By that time he had already missed other court hearings and checkins and warrants were being issued.
I am sure there was another incident much closer to Feb 2016, that same winter, classified either as burglary or breaking and entering but it was in his home instead of the barn. But I have searched and can't find it so maybe I'm dreaming.
