M. Kay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2017
- Messages
- 238
- Reaction score
- 1,452
I actually agree with you. However, I agree with other posters as well. Gray is no more of an expert than Greeno and Stroup. Im not taking up for those guys, but Hughes is not any type of verified expert...I am not sure why his word or his theories should be taken at face value any more than the other amateurs.
Not arguing here---feel compelled to mention that the world of difference between the presentations of GH and AG. Hughes'
videos are never finger pointing suspects. He scrupulously shows what's seen as fact---what is there. He aligns with timeline of other fact; checking with family members of the victims. This all speaks well of his intentions, can we agree on that?
On the other hand G & S are biased; and not in contact with victims family. G & S do not accurately speak or listen. I've attempted to give fair consideration, yet see their sloppy method as useless, except perhaps for LE to get someone on the record. I've been surprised that G& S were allowed on this forum for these and other unstated reasons. I was sympathetic at first, feeling one was unjustly suspected.
It may help the conversation if someone here provides an example from G & S that sheds any light on inquiring. I could have missed it!