not_my_kids
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 12,689
- Reaction score
- 280
The removal of the other kids is one of "those" things.
CPS has to prove clear and present danger in most situations before they can remove a child. Remember, we may question her decisions, but there are still guidelines to follow, and when you come right down to who actually killed this child, it wasn't either one of her parents.
The kids are no longer in contact with MP, he's in jail.
If the kids were molested or otherwise abused, it was not in the care of their parents directly.
CPS usually respects the rights of the parents to choose their own child care provider. Since he is not findable on any SO registry, it might be the opinion of the state that there was no way that TS could have known she was placing her children in mortal danger.
We can tell from her facebook postings that the kids do go to see doctor's, therefore there is little to no medical neglect, we don't know what the inside of her home looks like, but if it's not absolutely disgusting, there's no environmental neglect...
Unless the state can prove that the other children are at "significant or eminent risk of harm or death", they won't be going anywhere.
It's up to the worker that catches the case, essentially.
CPS has to prove clear and present danger in most situations before they can remove a child. Remember, we may question her decisions, but there are still guidelines to follow, and when you come right down to who actually killed this child, it wasn't either one of her parents.
The kids are no longer in contact with MP, he's in jail.
If the kids were molested or otherwise abused, it was not in the care of their parents directly.
CPS usually respects the rights of the parents to choose their own child care provider. Since he is not findable on any SO registry, it might be the opinion of the state that there was no way that TS could have known she was placing her children in mortal danger.
We can tell from her facebook postings that the kids do go to see doctor's, therefore there is little to no medical neglect, we don't know what the inside of her home looks like, but if it's not absolutely disgusting, there's no environmental neglect...
Unless the state can prove that the other children are at "significant or eminent risk of harm or death", they won't be going anywhere.
It's up to the worker that catches the case, essentially.