SpanishInquisition
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
- Messages
- 2,924
- Reaction score
- 6,069
What parts are the stool and apron?
It's the shelf and support of the window. The shelf is next to the sill itself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What parts are the stool and apron?
That metal railing is so much higher than the window ledge. In the CBS report they said he looked over the railing for a second, then bent down, picked her up, and held her "over" the railing. If that is the case then he must have lifted her over the railing and then lowered her down on the ledge several inches from the railing. If that's the case then no wonder she fell.I think this is what they are referring to as metal railing
Exactly — sometimes the simplest explanation is the right one - he just needs to admit his error and beg forgiveness IMOThat metal railing is so much higher than the window ledge. In the CBS report they said he looked over the railing for a second, then bent down, picked her up, and held her "over" the railing. If that is the case then he must have lifted her over the railing and then lowered her down on the ledge several inches from the railing. If that's the case then no wonder she fell.
Imo
I don't think she was sitting on the railing. It seems too high. I think he lifted her over the railing and then sat her on the window ledge. At least that's how it sounds from the description of the video.Also it's worse than being on the handrailing as now it's described that Chloe was put over the railing with her also being described as sitting on the metal railing AKA the windowsill. I think at a minimum Chloe's legs would have to have been out the window for her to be able to sit on the metal railing.
I never noticed until now how high that railing is from the ledge. I would think he would sit her under it but maybe she would have hit her head. The railing looks like a barrier between the inside of the ship to the window. I would think it would be hard to hold onto her with the railing between them.Exactly — sometimes the simplest explanation is the right one - he just needs to admit his error and beg forgiveness IMO
I don't think she was sitting on the railing. It seems too high. I think he lifted her over the railing and then sat her on the window ledge. At least that's how it sounds from the description of the video.
Imo
That metal railing is so much higher than the window ledge. In the CBS report they said he looked over the railing for a second, then bent down, picked her up, and held her "over" the railing. If that is the case then he must have lifted her over the railing and then lowered her down on the ledge several inches from the railing. If that's the case then no wonder she fell.
Imo
Funny, it looks brass to me..
That's what I'm saying. I'm saying that's what is being called "metal railing."
Yes and I even hate standing on those round circle glass floors in the windjammer and other spots - makes me dizzy just looking all that way down ...Let's say he lifted her up by her arms, as some adults do, and stood her on the timber railing, when he went to adjust his grip from her arms to her waist she toppled out.
Reports say she was sitting by then but this is still possible without seeing the video. He should have known how 2 yr old children will wriggle.
When I go cruising I have a tie that goes around the back of my neck so I don't lose my glasses overboard. Everything is high and everything is such a long way down & I'm fully aware of this 24/7.
I've NEVER seen a parent not crouch down to the child's level and still hold them away from the edges teaching them the dangers of heights.
I'd never put my full trust or weight against any glass or railing as it's a bloody long way down.
Because it happened so quickly maybe he doesn't really remember the exact sequence. He'll see what exactly happened when he sees the video as that won't lie.Exactly — sometimes the simplest explanation is the right one - he just needs to admit his error and beg forgiveness IMO
Yes and I just don't trust the salt corrosion although the upkeep of the RCCL is impeccable from what I see 'on the surface'.Yes and I even hate standing on those round circle glass floors in the windjammer and other spots - makes me dizzy just looking all that way down ...
Yes, that's what I was thinking, that he lifted her over the railing and slid her down to the ledge. He would have had to let go with one hand to hold her with his arms below the railing because he would have been in an awkward position holding his arms up and bending his elbows down. When he let go to switch positions to get a better grip, she fell.Let's say he lifted her up by her arms, as some adults do, and stood her on the timber railing, when he went to adjust his grip from her arms to her waist she toppled out.
Reports say she was sitting by then but this is still possible without seeing the video. He should have known how 2 yr old children will wriggle.
When I go cruising I have a tie that goes around the back of my neck so I don't lose my glasses overboard. Everything is high and everything is such a long way down & I'm fully aware of this 24/7.
I've NEVER seen a parent not crouch down to the child's level and still hold them away from the edges teaching them the dangers of heights.
I'd never put my full trust or weight against any glass or railing as it's a bloody long way down.
BBM Like a normal, rational adult in charge of a 19 month old child. I keep wondering why, if SA has all of these "issues" and "conditions" and "impairments" and was KNOWN to be reckless, why was he given charge of Chloe? Just one of the parts of this case I don't quite grasp. MOOYes, that's what I was thinking, that he lifted her over the railing and slid her down to the ledge. He would have had to let go with one hand to hold her with his arms below the railing because he would have been in an awkward position holding his arms up and bending his elbows down. When he let go to switch positions to get a better grip, she fell.
He sure didn't plan that out very well.
If he had just held her up to the railing and kept her body on the inside, in front of the railing, it would have been fine.
Imo
Yes, that's what I was thinking, that he lifted her over the railing and slid her down to the ledge. He would have had to let go with one hand to hold her with his arms below the railing because he would have been in an awkward position holding his arms up and bending his elbows down. When he let go to switch positions to get a better grip, she fell.
He sure didn't plan that out very well.
If he had just held her up to the railing and kept her body on the inside, in front of the railing, it would have been fine.
Imo
That puts the defense in an awkward position as far as the parents are concerned, but I think that's one reason for where they're going. They will probably find numerous ways around it. A defense attorney's job is to be zealous in his representation. I'm not saying they're planning to outright lie but there seem to be a lot of ways they can say there was an impairment that was not then known. Or just stick to the insistence that in his mind he thought there was glass. They can't prove what was in his mind. It seems like he insists on this despite apparently having his hands outside of the window. I think the PR prosecutors know the case is backed up. But why is it getting this far without a plea?BBM Like a normal, rational adult in charge of a 19 month old child. I keep wondering why, if SA has all of these "issues" and "conditions" and "impairments" and was KNOWN to be reckless, why was he given charge of Chloe? Just one of the parts of this case I don't quite grasp. MOO
RIIIIIIIIGHT.....In the interview he says he was holding Chloe and reaching out to feel the glass. How can that be?? If he sees that his hand goes past the window then why doesn't he know that the window has no glass?