Whoa now, I am in no way trying to flash an argument, I am just merely suggesting that we are about to see a very big shift in the 'mood' of this investigation. Just my opinion, of course. Even the images they have chosen; everything. It is to present a completely innocent college woman. I agree alcohol and drugs do not make people disappear, but it would not have happened had Lauren Spierer learned an appropriate lesson from her prior run-ins with the law. Again, just my opinion.
But we can hang JR, JW and maybe even CR and DR at will.
I take into consideration that she was young, and it pains me that her parents have to hear this stuff, but Lauren's condition, how much she had to drink, what drugs she may have taken, are very important to the investigation and to an honest account of the story. I do not judge her, believe me, that could have been me, I have partied a lot worse in my day. But you can't hide your head in the sand either.
And that goes to the 3:38am witness, because she is the one who has given the most vivid description of Lauren's condition. I could see why some people just don't want to believe what she is saying -- and I'm not talking about the timeline.
Thanks!
I don't see anyone caring plastic bags of evidence. Does anyone know what kind of dog this is and if one type is better than another for certain types of searches? Is this a border collie? They are used for both drug-sniffing and cadaver detection from what I read.
This is regarding an abduction theory. So suppose she leaves jr's crosses 10th and takes a left to head to jw's. Maybe a possible abduction from those different route possibilities. Forgive me if this has been posted, but any surveillance should be assessed from any of those possible routes. I guess I should look into the Bloomington website of surveillance or Btown's map before I post, but I'm hoping someone has some insight or has maybe walked these various routes. I mapquested the different routes based on walking and obviously there are several ways to go. So maybe this could be another option... Leaves jr's takes a path to see jw and meets with a random car or individual in that area.
"Revised. this is from elmomom BBM. I couldn't get the quote box to work!
Current theories of the case, in order rof what seems to be believed here:
1. JR (possibly with friend that is visiting from home) are responsible for hiding deceased LS
2. LS leaves JR intact, meets up with JW, harm comes to her
3. LS leaves JR intact, goes missing (random abduction or lost in unknown accident)
4. LS leaves JR and/or JR residence, meets another person, possibly at College and 10th, harm comes to her (this may include non-random abduction)
5. LS never makes it to 5 North, and CR/MB/JR in conspiracy
6. LS leaves voluntarily
So, other than differing details in the above, does anyone have a theory that doesn't fit one of the above? Please comment and I will add it, thanks!"
But we can hang JR, JW and maybe even CR and DR at will.
I take into consideration that she was young, and it pains me that her parents have to hear this stuff, but Lauren's condition, how much she had to drink, what drugs she may have taken, are very important to the investigation and to an honest account of the story. I do not judge her, believe me, that could have been me, I have partied a lot worse in my day. But you can't hide your head in the sand either.
And that goes to the 3:38am witness, because she is the one who has given the most vivid description of Lauren's condition. I could see why some people just don't want to believe what she is saying -- and I'm not talking about the timeline.
Once you get east of walnut is almost all residential...i guess 10th st would be the best chance of a camera. as usual, i defer to the locals.
I know the question was for elmomom, but I'd like to offer a theory.
I think it's plausible that LS would've have attempted the walk to JW's. The night started to out to be fun, but it took a turn for the worse when the fight broke out at Smallwood. Any young woman would've been shaken by that. CR's in bad shape, and she has to help him home. She's not comfortable there, so she decides to go back to JR's. She's lost her phone, shoes, and keys, and she needs to regroup, talk to someone about what happened. Their grandparents were neighbors for 20 years, and even if he was not a close friend, I think he offered a sense of familiarity and safety. But it doesn't turn out that way. Maybe he's loaded, not being helpful. He might've even tried to come on to her. For whatever reason, she doesn't want to be there. She feels sick, tired, and just wants to be home, somewhere safe. DR doesn't answer, so she can't get in her apartment. Maybe she can make it to JW's. After all, she really does love him, and he's the only person who can comfort her now.
No it isn't ok, but it is pervasive in college campus life. Add to that, it is well documented that the brain is not mature at 18-22, and one of the most common symptoms of that is not having appropriate risk aversion. This age group is notorious for taking risks. That can be influenced by upbringing and responsibilities, but it is a fact of the normal process of maturation just the same.Young people need to understand that excessive drinking is NOT ok or cool...
It is an eye-opening experience to read these forums or internet articles and see what they have to say about these kids. I feel like I had a similar group of friends that, similarly, sometimes drank and experimented too much. I cannot imagine how it would feel to hear some of the things people are saying if something had happened to one of us.
In general, even college students who drink a bit too much sometimes or experiment with drugs are generally good kids. Doing that doesn't mean you are a horrible person. Out of our group, most of us grew up and became something-loving mothers and fathers, award winning teachers, social workers who genuinely care, etc. Lauren may never get that chance to grow up and become a loving mother, a teacher, a fashion designer-whatever she could have become. That is what is sad to me and that is what I am going to focus on.
I am not denying that she took risks that people shouldn't take, but I won't judge her either. Or any of the POI's really-UNLESS they somehow hurt Lauren. Then my non-judgment/sympathy will be immediately revoked.