I never said or implied that whatever it was that Mr. Kronk saw in August was easy to see.
This is what you said, and it does imply Cain could have walked right in and saw it:
I can't figure out why Mr. Kronk did not simply lead Mr. Cain to a place along the edge of the road that was directly in front of what he saw. He could have pointed to what he saw and asked Mr. Cain to march straight ahead (for 10 to 15 feet) and see what it is.
BBM below - In my recollection, those 2 men did not go all the way in, thus would not have seen what Kronk saw.
When Mr. Kronk first, allegedly, saw something in August, which he believes was Caylee's skull, there were two other men in the vehicle with Mr. Kronk that day. Those two men could not see what Mr. Kronk alleges he saw. They didn't see anything suspicious. Yet, Caylee's remains seem to have been but 10 feet to 15 feet off the road. And Mr. Kronk knew exactly where the object was that he saw, but he couldn't, or wouldn't, simply direct Mr. Cain to that spot along the road and then have him take three to five steps straight ahead.
BBM - red - Again implying that Caylee was easy to spot. I believe your estimate of footage is incorrect, please look it up, as your inference is that anybody could have spotted Caylee easily.
This is where the experimenting I asked you to do comes in. I posit that from your armchair you have no concept of what it is like to look through heavy, dense brush and vegetation,
and until you do, you will not understand this situation.
Moreover, an obvious question is: how do you see a skull in August that you find inside a closed black plastic bag in December? Mr. Kronk's story is not evidence that works against Casey. Mr. Kronk's story is evidence that works against Mr. Kronk.
See my response above about looking through dense underbrush in order to understand.
As for evidence that works against Casey - finding the body does exactly that!
Kronk's story does not "work against him.' Plenty of eyewitnesses recall more information - and differently - later as they think about it. Do you think he sat there and studied every detail until he had it memorized? He!! no, he saw something he believed to be Caylee, and hightailed it out of there to call the cops, as a responsible citizen should do - not hang around and possibly contaminate evidence.
As for having justice served, that comes about by having highly reliable evidence to support the charge or charges levied by prosecutors. And, no one, anywhere, has been able to cite the highly reliable evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Casey committed a premeditated murder (murder one).
It is pretty obvious to most people that understand human nature that Casey is responsible for whatever happened to Caylee - just based upon her actions and words alone. Without even putting any forensics into play. Her lying and making up people to support her lies speaks volumes.
Casey was raised apparently never having to pay for the consequences of her actions (all the previous thefts and lieing, etc), and I myself think it is high time she learns. I doubt that she will get the DP, but LWOP would be fine in this case. And maybe she will finally break down, admit what happened and get even less time (depending on what she admits).
My :twocents: , respectfully.