skibaboo
Mrs Map
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 10,706
- Reaction score
- 5,005
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of what I have read here I would say that the Morgan/Ammerman family is a dysfunctional family, be it because of a history of alcoholism, drug use, mental illness/disabilites, or for some other reasons, and it's very possible that the family/ies have been dysfunctional for several generations. For a person having grown up in a dysfunctional family, it's difficult to know and understand the rules for what is considered as normal behaviour, and to be able to "read" other people and to understand their non-verbal behaviour. What most people consider "normal" when it comes to how to take care of a child, to see to the safety of a child, whom to allow near or allow to handle the child, is most likely not things that come naturally to people from dysfunctional families, especially if it's not how they and their children had been brought up. If having a lackadaisical upbringing had been ok with the parents/grandparents, the family members today would probably not see any reason why it wouldn't be ok bringing up the little girl in the same manner.
I don't know if the majority of people here comes from "normal"/non-dysfunctional families or not, but to me it seems that most of those who have comment doesn't truly understand how it can be to grow up in a dysfunctional family, that what is considered as "normal" within a dysfunctional family is not the same as what society at large and people from non-dysfunctional families take for granted when it comes to "normal" (and acceptable) behaviour in today's world when it comes to how live and to how to bring up a small child.
This is MOO.
Did any of the parents take their child and leave? Did any of the parents drink at the party? In your scenario, the "fault" (if any) would not just lie with the party giver, but also with the party goers who, well, partied! IMO
Yeah - given what we've read and what they've said, I think they're pretty familiar with alcohol. IMO it might not be a stretch to say they drink frequently. Not stating that as fact but that's my gut. I'm sure if they said the guy was drunk, he was probably falling down drunk. Not just tipsy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We don't know that they aren't saying that to themselves.I feel horrible for these people, I wouldn't wish this situation on my worst enemy. I cannot IMAGINE their grief. But unless these people are monsters, how could they not say to themselves My God!! If only we hadn't passed out drunk!
Of COURSE they are not behavioral analyst level security people, who is? Of course I don't ID everyone who enters my door. But no FREAKING WAY an I going to pass out drunk while a friend-of-a-friend acquaintance is up drinking alone in my house and my baby is right there!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of what I have read here I would say that the Morgan/Ammerman family is a dysfunctional family, be it because of a history of alcoholism, drug use, mental illness/disabilites, or for some other reasons, and it's very possible that the family/ies have been dysfunctional for several generations. For a person having grown up in a dysfunctional family, it's difficult to know and understand the rules for what is considered as normal behaviour, and to be able to "read" other people and to understand their non-verbal behaviour. What most people consider "normal" when it comes to how to take care of a child, to see to the safety of a child, whom to allow near or allow to handle the child, is most likely not things that come naturally to people from dysfunctional families, especially if it's not how they and their children had been brought up. If having a lackadaisical upbringing had been ok with the parents/grandparents, the family members today would probably not see any reason why it wouldn't be ok bringing up the little girl in the same manner.
I don't know if the majority of people here comes from "normal"/non-dysfunctional families or not, but to me it seems that most of those who have comment doesn't truly understand how it can be to grow up in a dysfunctional family, that what is considered as "normal" within a dysfunctional family is not the same as what society at large and people from non-dysfunctional families take for granted when it comes to "normal" (and acceptable) behaviour in today's world when it comes to how live and to how to bring up a small child.
This is MOO.
We don't know that they aren't saying that to themselves.
You don't wait to know that a person is a potential threat to take precaution. Dad bears the responsibility for the safety of his child. He got drunk and passed out, leaving his baby girl unprotected and at the mercy of other drunken men - one her own uncle who was so drunk he couldn't SEE. This wasn't the uncle's first drinking rodeo, dad knew what kind of person he was and what kind of person Kyle was. It isn't rocket science. He was completely irresponsible and woefully negligent and his baby suffered from his stupidity.
Boy am I ever glad I missed that kitten discussion.
It really bothers me that you have two grown men living with momma and step-dad, sharing a room, having friends over and drinking to all hours of the morning.
On AA's facebook page, in the about field, it says "Im a single man in need of some love". But you still live with momma!??
I'm just thinking what we all find as "abnormal behavior" is not what the Ammermans would call abnormal behavior. If it is normal to share a bedroom with your adult brother, normal not to work, normal to live at home with momma still, normal to drink to all hours of the night with "friend of a friend" on a TUESDAY night, then to me, they seem to have a very broad definition of normal. So broad in fact that I think the "red flags" to us, could have smacked them in the face and they would have still seen them as yellow flags! I'm not defending them by any means. I do not understand this family, something really seems off to me but it could just be because we live such different lives.
All of this MOO
I've been thinking about the negligence issue over and over in my head.
Let's say that there were no red flags. No reason to be suspicious or look sideways at an acquaintance who says Coochie Coochie coo to the baby and holds her and rocks her. Fine.
It's a HUGE leap between someone saying hi baby and handing the baby a pacifier or bottle if they're crying or picking them up and assuming it's ok TO PASS OUT DRUNK WHILE THIS ACQUAINTANCE IS IN YOUR HOUSE.
The family said they knew him less than a year, and as another poster pointed out he was in jail or some kind of program for approximately half that time. For all we know, the 10 or 12 times he came over could've just been for a few minutes or briefly stopping by. Even if it wasn't, even if he spent hours at the house, please see my above paragraph.
And please, please, don't quote me and say provide a link for him saying Coochie Coochie coo and picking her up. That is just me making up a scenario based on how they described him interacting with the baby.
So even with no knowledge of *advertiser censored*, no red flags, it is still not sound judgement to let the ("nice polite") man whom you don't really know well have full access to your house and baby at 2 in the morning while all FOUR adults are asleep, taking sleeping meds, or passed out drunk. Even if they are "different".
Seriously. For the love of God. IT'S NOT OK.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Please provide a link to the two adult brothers sharing a bedroom. You will not find it because it does not exist.
This is exactly how rumor and misconception grows legs to morph into fact.
ETA facts
“There is only one way in and out of our house, the front door, because the other door is blocked by her father’s bed. No one could get through the windows, because there is furniture in front of every window,” she noted. “They had to walk in the front door, or out the front door, with her.”
http://www.spencereveningworld.com/...ssing_Toddler_Found_Thursday_Northeast_O.html
Justin Ammerman does not have a "bedroom" in the home, shared or otherwise. He apparently uses another space as his sleeping area.