IMO, Ronald may want to reconsider whom he uses as advisors.perhaps... I do not think that this marriage served to do anything for appearance purposes. On the contrary, it made him appear to possess very poor judgmentI wouldn't marry the last person known to be with my child before she went missing...however, maybe Ronald had his reasons. That remains to be seen. and perhaps even skewed morals and character.
JMO. Of course.
I seem to remember that it was once considered that husband & wife could not be compelled to testify against one another in court. I have often wondered if that sort of thinking went into this sudden marriage.
I'm sorry, but calling RC and this barely 17 y/o girl he knew for a short time and decided to run out and get married right after Haleigh went missing a family is an insult. She's a child who was most likely involved in drugs and cheating on him. THAT is not a family.
ITA YellowSub. I could not say w certainty whether complicity in Haleigh's disappearance was a factor or not in their decision. But according to a few of these posts this had nothing whatsoever to do with evading a possible prison term either, nor control of custody, nor controlling Misty, nor even for convenience, it was all strictly an altruistic marriage of "comfort." All was forgiven and forgotten by this ordinary "couple" after an everyday lover's quarrel living their normal life. I've seen them described on these threads as a family w "two parental figures" too, and insisting RC was Misty's key to salvation, ticket to freedom, and knight in shining armor wondering how Misty could've possibly been exploited.
:waitasec:
Any girl is harmed when used or exploited by an adult male. Simply because Misty had never known anything different, anything except drugs, drama and dysfunction doesn't justify perpetuating the use/abuse of a child for one's own ends. Truth told, this is about as far from a "normal two-parent family" dynamic as I care to imagine. The pastor refused to even perform the ceremony--it was perfume on a pig. A ring could no more magically transform this troubled girl into a grown adult or marriage material than into a responsible caregiver and stable mother figure. Talk about from the frying pan straight to the fire. An intervention was needed in Misty's life alright, but hooking up with RC and playing 'mommy' and happy homemaker wasn't it. And the patterns of arguments, acting out, assaults, and arrests etc have continued ever since which don't bode any better for Junior than they did for Haleigh.
:frown:
Are we to honestly believe anything changed or improved once they married. Does anyone really believe Misty eg is better off now? Was this a safe arrangement for any of the minor children involved? I mean has there been a good outcome for anyone? How's that workin' out for everybody? I would say LE now has at it's feet, as the result of such blurred parent-child boundaries (not to mention immature decisions, poor judgment and misguided priorities) a FAR graver situation than either a teen's housing OR a single father's childcare issues... well, now Misty's living at GGMS, and RC has one less small child to care for but maybe we oughta be wishing instead that a more appropriate solution had been arrived at for both Misty (housing free of underage sexploitation) and for RC (appropriate childcare). Or that God forbid he'd actually been prosecuted for those statutory crimes. As opposed to, say, the price paid ultimately by...
:rose:Haleigh:rose: for the surrogating or substituting of a child for an adult. I pray better things, a happier destiny awaits Junior. JMO rayer:
arrot:
Hi Porcine..
...cause this one brought the media down on him. People were screaming "pedophile". The only way to avoid the orange jump suit was to marry the child. This is one situation that was bigger than him. It wasn't going away and people were judging him. I think they were ready to bring the torches and pitchforks.l
I had voted it's too bizarre.
Not really bizarre but beyond my ability to make an educated guess as to why they may have married.
I just don't see proof that would allow me, personally, to support any of the other choices. IMHO.
ITA YellowSub. I could not say w certainty whether complicity in Haleigh's disappearance was a factor or not in their decision. But according to a few of these posts this had nothing whatsoever to do with evading a possible prison term either, nor control of custody, nor controlling Misty, nor even for convenience, it was all strictly an altruistic marriage of "comfort." All was forgiven and forgotten by this ordinary "couple" after an everyday lover's quarrel living their normal life. I've seen them described on these threads as a family w "two parental figures" too, and insisting RC was Misty's key to salvation, ticket to freedom, and knight in shining armor wondering how Misty could've possibly been exploited.
:waitasec:
Any girl is harmed when used or exploited by an adult male. Simply because Misty had never known anything different, anything except drugs, drama and dysfunction doesn't justify perpetuating the use/abuse of a child for one's own ends. Truth told, this is about as far from a "normal two-parent family" dynamic as I care to imagine. The pastor refused to even perform the ceremony--it was perfume on a pig. A ring could no more magically transform this troubled girl into a grown adult or marriage material than into a responsible caregiver and stable mother figure. Talk about from the frying pan straight to the fire. An intervention was needed in Misty's life alright, but hooking up with RC and playing 'mommy' and happy homemaker wasn't it. And the patterns of arguments, acting out, assaults, and arrests etc have continued ever since which don't bode any better for Junior than they did for Haleigh.
:frown:
Are we to honestly believe anything changed or improved once they married. Does anyone really believe Misty eg is better off now? Was this a safe arrangement for any of the minor children involved? I mean has there been a good outcome for anyone? How's that workin' out for everybody? I would say LE now has at it's feet, as the result of such blurred parent-child boundaries (not to mention immature decisions, poor judgment and misguided priorities) a FAR graver situation than either a teen's housing OR a single father's childcare issues... well, now Misty's living at GGMS, and RC has one less small child to care for but maybe we oughta be wishing instead that a more appropriate solution had been arrived at for both Misty (housing free of underage sexploitation) and for RC (appropriate childcare). Or that God forbid he'd actually been prosecuted for those statutory crimes. As opposed to, say, the price paid ultimately by...
:rose:Haleigh:rose: for the surrogating or substituting of a child for an adult. I pray better things, a happier destiny awaits Junior. JMO rayer:
arrot:
AMEN to the part I bolded. Why in the world would they rush the wedding? Why not wait till Haleigh can be there?
Ya know... just a thought, but in my experience, when I hear people say they are doing something because "it's what So-and-So would have wanted"... that usually indicates So-and-So is already gone... passed on... departed from this earth. I can say my mother or my dad would have wanted me to do this or that... because both are gone now. I would not say that my missing child "would have wanted" something.
And truth be known... I doubt that Haleigh would have cared one way or another, other than getting to dress up and be a part of the ceremony. To a 5 yr old, that would be the big to-do about it... not the marriage itself.