Now that these communications by CA about RG have been made public, and make CA look like more of a crazed, throw- anyone- under -the -bus type of gal, can we now provide proof that her comments and view of RG have some merit?
Although he has changed his webpages, I have alot of it saved. I spent a good month or so digging into RG after seeing his websites, blog comments, interviews etc which scared the heck out of me. So maybe I'm a nutcase too- but then I know for a fact I was not the only Ws'er who viewed RG as suspect- (Not necessarily A suspect).
RG is head of the supernatural response team. He was asking for public donations in order to buy a bus so that he and his team could travel far and wide to perform exorcisms on people and houses.and he already had 'proof' of how successful his exorcisms were.
There is so much more 'out there' stuff that I can post here but doubt that the mods will allow it despite it coming directly from RG's sites. (but it backs up much of what CA had to say about RG)
I am not saying any of this because I don't agree with his religious beliefs , I just dont think its fair to have people believe that this was all in CA's imagination.
She didn't make those things up! They come straight from RG (or someone posing as him), and posters here as well as the public should know that, because this is about getting to the TRUTH. Not distorting the facts.
Quote Respect butwhatif?
I didn't even go out of my way to look for any information on RG outside of WS but it ended up happening, recently. Sigh. His religious beliefs are what I, in my own head, call "out there" and that is putting it nicely. But any of that, means much less that he would have had anything to do with Caylee's death, than the truth about Casey in her every word and deed. Having very different religious beliefs(different from who? is the philosophical question here) does not in any way logically go to: kidnapping or murder.
And, why wouldn't Casey say something about that, like how anyone else would have come to have Caylee. Well, she did-she said she gave her to Zanny. The G's had Caylee in their home so much, they had to say, "no more" to Casey about that, hence Casey telling RG about ZFG and Caylee spending
less time with the Gs.
For the record I do not believe RG had anything to do with Caylee's death. If there was any sort of evidence regarding RG, why is it RK was the defense's lastest offering in SODDI? Non sarcastically, I may not understand how it works but why wouldn't Cindy share her information and suspicions at least with Casey's defense?
But, I wanted to say that I (in a very little tiny way), understand where butwhatif? is coming from. How's that for a compliment(?), sorry-I hope you can tell I respect your opinion and am just willing to talk about it because I did entertain the thought.
I wonder why Cindy didn't accuse RG in public? I don't know that she did, but I could be wrong. She only accused his son, Jesse-to LE and in public many times. If she had such strong feelings regarding RG, one could see she hadn't held back before...? When she received this information from her P.I. re: RG did she report her findings to LE? My understanding is Cindy did not want these emails turned over to LE.
I go there. I don't like anything Cindy has done. But for the sake of truth. I go there. I follow her down that rabbit hole. But then I say, "no!" Because: why wasn't there any follow up on him by Cindy? Or any of the people they felt were guilty, suspicious? They do yell that LE did not follow up, and we see they took things into their own hands-that's fine-but the proof is in the pudding. Time tells and more than any thing Casey or her family have said, it's what they
haven't said that means they are not really interested in finding out what really happened to Caylee. If there were leads, they should be following them. Tirelessly. They would have found JH and Juliette like that one scientist did...
If I am playing to Cindy's side I think, "Cindy, follow those leads so you can prove that Casey is innocent." Right?
But, then she doesn't.
And the comment that I put in bold re: people knowing the truth. I agree. I feel strongly about truth. But what is nice, is that anyone coming here to WS or looking for information via the internet can see the very same information available to everyone. No one has to take anyone's word on anything. Everything on the internet is just information, even us. It's great that Cindy was looking for information but there was no "realife" follow up, is what I am seeing. All talk and no walk.
...jmo...
