faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
Not having paid that much attention to this aspect of the case now it has come to our attention that DC is trying to avoid a Depo in November due to that fact he says he was working for JB.
Yesterday I ran across the letter, dated in October 2008, where DC shook hands and wished JB good luck before parting amicably.
This should be interesting.
Somewhere in all the LE interviews and depositions he claimed to have seperate emploment agreements with Baez, GA and CA and (drum roll please) KC herself.
Now lawyer types please correct me if I am wrong, but direct employees of a defendent, those having a direct relationship to the accused, can never be covered by the defendents lawyers attorney client privilege, correct? As a defendent your conversations with your own employee's would never ever be covered by any privilege, unless that employee is an attorney (or a direct member of the white house staff). Otherwise a defense attorney could easily quash prosecutors and LE witnesses and testimony by paying everyone involved a dollar. The only non attorney persons covered by the AC privilege are the attorneys direct staff. Those who work for him, not the defendent.
Am I missing something in this?