Valhall
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,039
- Reaction score
- 652
I have not shared that I felt compelled to call Morgan & Morgan a couple of days after the depositions to ask if they knew about the following two issues: 1. the "zenaida" myspace created on 06/16/08 and last accessed on 10/14/08, and 2. the ZG22 with the NVDL citation who has disappeared since about August.
The response was interesting. I'm going to set up two hypotheticals to illustrate. Let's say there's a murder in your local area and you know what you think may be information about another event that could be pertinent to the situation and you call your local police and you say "Do you guys know about [fill in the blank]." If the response is "Yeah, yeah we know about it." and you say "Oh, okay, just wanted to be sure." And they say "thanks for calling" and hang up, you'll get the sense that the information you have may not be pertinent...in other words, they've looked into it and it's not connected.
But if you call them and share your information and the response is "mmm-hmmmm" (in the same way a friend might respond if you share that say a rumored man is allegedly cheating on his wife and you say "did you know so and so saw his car at such and such's house)...that kind of mmm-hmmmm...then you get the sense that they are not trivializing the information...that there may be pertinence to the information being shared.
To both points I brought up the response was the latter. Take it for what it's worth, but I got the feeling that neither issue had been ruled irrelevant. In addition, at the close of the phone call, I was told "and if you find out anything else, please call me back."
And, yes, I was speaking with an attorney.
__________________
The response was interesting. I'm going to set up two hypotheticals to illustrate. Let's say there's a murder in your local area and you know what you think may be information about another event that could be pertinent to the situation and you call your local police and you say "Do you guys know about [fill in the blank]." If the response is "Yeah, yeah we know about it." and you say "Oh, okay, just wanted to be sure." And they say "thanks for calling" and hang up, you'll get the sense that the information you have may not be pertinent...in other words, they've looked into it and it's not connected.
But if you call them and share your information and the response is "mmm-hmmmm" (in the same way a friend might respond if you share that say a rumored man is allegedly cheating on his wife and you say "did you know so and so saw his car at such and such's house)...that kind of mmm-hmmmm...then you get the sense that they are not trivializing the information...that there may be pertinence to the information being shared.
To both points I brought up the response was the latter. Take it for what it's worth, but I got the feeling that neither issue had been ruled irrelevant. In addition, at the close of the phone call, I was told "and if you find out anything else, please call me back."
And, yes, I was speaking with an attorney.
__________________