Marina2
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 2,244
- Reaction score
- 2
I think this fits into the plea topic. Yes, the evidence in the trunk has not really panned out for the Le. I do not think they will be able to prove Caylee was in the trunk. I base that on whats not there. As Dr Vass said it was not consistent with the child in the trunk in Montana. There should have been much more there.
No fibers at the crime scene matched up with anything in the car.
No finger prints.
To me it was Jb taking Hl into examine the car. That to me was a huge risk. Hl found more hairs and that lead to the garage finding even more hairs. Those potentially could have had the death band on them, but they didn't. Jb knew Caylee was never in that trunk and thats why he let Hl examine it.
Second big one to me was Jb saying to Kb she wasn't there, your in la la land. That starts to knock out the accident theory.
Third was Jb recently saying no chance for a plea, this is going to trial.
Jb is playing dumb, and it is an act. AL is playing scared (witch trials) and it is an act. They are sandbagging. When they get a chance to make their case at trial, it is going to be volley fire. We haven't even discussed Le mistakes.
That is my opinion. This week the two sides are to sit down and exchange discovery. The Sa may find out with proof that the body wasn't there in August. Hence the deadline. Moo They are confident, silence is golden.
Hi NTS,
I hope this isn't getting too OT. Maybe we should discuss on the evidence in the trunk thread. As far as the plea deal goes and the defense' confidence, I just don't see it. To me, their actions seems to be just SOP in cases like this.
Regarding the Montana child who was in the trunk, does anyone really expect that what was found should be consistent with what was found in KC's trunk? After all, the child in Montana lay in that trunk for months. If Caylee were in KC's trunk, she was only there for three, four days at the most I think. Certainly, we could expect more to be found in the former case.
I didn't know that all the fiber evidence has been examined and reported on. Do you have a link that shows no fibers found at the scene matched any from the trunk? Not saying that you are wrong, I just haven't read this in the documents yet and would like to see it. The fiber evidence is something I have been waiting to see.
I don't understand how JB accusing KB of being in la la land because the body wasn't in the trunk knocks out the accident theory. (or starts to as you say)
I still don't see any facts that the defense has that would give them confidence in their case to the point of turning down a potentially life-saving plea deal for KC.