It Can't Happen Here - 2nd Edition - Answers In The Sand

Eloc and Joy. Joy and Jared worked mercifully to get this back in the forefront of everyone again. To discredit Joy is to discredit Jared, which is 100% wrong.

Hm. Perhaps one needs to do a little bit more reading to see the truth.
 
Eloc and Joy. Joy and Jared worked mercifully to get this back in the forefront of everyone again. To discredit Joy is to discredit Jared, which is 100% wrong.

Where or how was Joy discredited in that post?
 
DR walking onto it can't be proven factually.

This isn't correct. DR himself stated that he could not get out of the driveway that morning because of crime scene tape across the driveway, so he got out of his car, crossed the tape, and "jogged" over to ask how to get out, and the officers were upset with him because he had lifted and crossed into the taped off crime scene area. Since he admits this himself in various interviews, that seems like solid proof.

"The next morning, Rassier left for work and started to drive down his driveway, but was unable to cross the crime scene tape that investigators had put up across the driveway. Rassier said he crossed the tape and jogged down the driveway to ask officers how he could get out, and that the officers became upset with him and directed him to drive through the shallow grassy swale alongside the driveway. (38)
Despite having that second contact with officers in his driveway that morning, Rassier said was not questioned by investigators until later on Monday morning at his teaching job at Rocori School in Cold Spring." (From the book It Can't Happen Here)
 
Similarly, one needs to admit they were completely wrong and publicly apologize to DR for the hundreds of posts attempting to paint DR as the perpetrator.
Hm. Perhaps one needs to do a little bit more reading to see the truth.
 
Did DR walk under the crime scene tape, yes. Did he contaminate the prints lifted of the suspects tire and foot prints, no. That is what Sasquatch was addressing and what I was addressing.

This isn't correct. DR himself stated that he could not get out of the driveway that morning because of crime scene tape across the driveway, so he got out of his car, crossed the tape, and "jogged" over to ask how to get out, and the officers were upset with him because he had lifted and crossed into the taped off crime scene area. Since he admits this himself in various interviews, that seems like solid proof.

"The next morning, Rassier left for work and started to drive down his driveway, but was unable to cross the crime scene tape that investigators had put up across the driveway. Rassier said he crossed the tape and jogged down the driveway to ask officers how he could get out, and that the officers became upset with him and directed him to drive through the shallow grassy swale alongside the driveway. (38)
Despite having that second contact with officers in his driveway that morning, Rassier said was not questioned by investigators until later on Monday morning at his teaching job at Rocori School in Cold Spring." (From the book It Can't Happen Here)
 
Similarly, one needs to admit they were completely wrong and publicly apologize to DR for the hundreds of posts attempting to paint DR as the perpetrator.

Hm.If you recall, I was the one who was trying to figure out who Hart was.

If you recall, I was the one wondering why LE had decided that DR was a POI. I was not LE who determined he was a POI. And of course, there were other things re DR out there.

We still do not know why multiple agencies decided DR was a POI . In light of the Heinrich info, it makes zero sense.

Every agency over the last five years? Why?
 
I'm hearing from someone in the TC's that WCCO is airing a story tonight saying there is a possible connection between the Jacob Wetterling case, and the unsolved bombing of the Kimball Post Office in 1976...story tonight at 10:00?
 
I'm hearing from someone in the TC's that WCCO is airing a story tonight saying there is a possible connection between the Jacob Wetterling case, and the unsolved bombing of the Kimball Post Office in 1976...story tonight at 10:00?

I think someone has their stories mixed up, or did this really happen?
 
Very happy that Ivend Holen's family may finally get the answers they deserve.

This is what happens when you look at DAH for the right crimes, and when a journalist has the guts to swim against the tide.

Thank you, Eloc! This is what it takes.
 
It will be interesting to see what evidence remains from this case. It's a bit off topic for this thread though.

Very happy that Ivend Holen's family may finally get the answers they deserve.

This is what happens when you look at DAH for the right crimes, and when a journalist has the guts to swim against the tide.
 
Maybe Hart (once looked at in Jacob's case) will spill info about Jacob to the police if they investigate him for the bombing.
 
We’re hearing from someone in the TC's that the seemingly endless Dudley Do-Good Wisconsin Amateur Hour may eventually be brought to a halt with yet another new pro bono lawsuit, and that said lawsuit will include television news organizations that continue to blindly encourage said do-gooder to their own financial detriment . . . but what could form the basis for such a suit? And would such a suit stop the amateur hour before those released from MSOP have an opportunity to do so?





Prov. 11:14
 
We’re hearing from someone in the TC's that the seemingly endless Dudley Do-Good Wisconsin Amateur Hour may eventually be brought to a halt with yet another new pro bono lawsuit, and that said lawsuit will include television news organizations that continue to blindly encourage said do-gooder to their own financial detriment . . . but what could form the basis for such a suit? And would such a suit stop the amateur hour before those released from MSOP have an opportunity to do so?





Prov. 11:14

Cute. While you're at it maybe check into what the program director of the JWRC has been doing while acting under the taxpayer funded (thru non-profit status) organization to threaten to withhold media access to certain people?
 
Very happy that Ivend Holen's family may finally get the answers they deserve.

This is what happens when you look at DAH for the right crimes, and when a journalist has the guts to swim against the tide.

The things Hart did show him to be more vicious. Dragging a horse and breaking the legs? Wow.

He never had a chance in life. His early life sounds like something out of a horror novel.

I wish we could do more to help children but it sounds like with the expose at Mesabi Academy, things have not changed re kids with issues, Somehow we have to find answers .
 
We’re hearing from someone in the TC's that the seemingly endless Dudley Do-Good Wisconsin Amateur Hour may eventually be brought to a halt with yet another new pro bono lawsuit, and that said lawsuit will include television news organizations that continue to blindly encourage said do-gooder to their own financial detriment . . . but what could form the basis for such a suit? And would such a suit stop the amateur hour before those released from MSOP have an opportunity to do so?





Prov. 11:14
Why would Dudley Do-Good(I got the Bullwinkle reference) need to be brought to a halt? And why would those "released from MSOP" have the same incentive?
 
We’re hearing from someone in the TC's that the seemingly endless Dudley Do-Good Wisconsin Amateur Hour may eventually be brought to a halt with yet another new pro bono lawsuit, and that said lawsuit will include television news organizations that continue to blindly encourage said do-gooder to their own financial detriment . . . but what could form the basis for such a suit? And would such a suit stop the amateur hour before those released from MSOP have an opportunity to do so?





Prov. 11:14

Is this a warning?
 
Similarly, one needs to admit they were completely wrong and publicly apologize to DR for the hundreds of posts attempting to paint DR as the perpetrator.

Working out a crime by systematically discussing each and every point of evidence, discussing the LE NAMED POI to rule him in or out (in our minds) along with a host of other potential POI's is NOT attempting to paint DR as the perpetrator. It is investigative technique. So far we have NO CONCRETE EVIDENCE that rules anyone in or out as the perpetrator. At this juncture DR is at the bottom of the list, and until LE takes him off, they have not ruled him out. We have a much better POI to work with, and even though I have evaluated all the foot and tire print evidence I have been able to find and have been supplied with by others here, it is not CONCRETE EVIDENCE. LE will not share their photographs and plaster casts with me (I asked). I am a print forensics expert with over 50 years experience, so if they will not share, there is not much more I can do to help nail this down.
 

DNASolves

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
49
Guests online
2,145
Total visitors
2,194

Forum statistics

Threads
615,832
Messages
18,341,331
Members
236,844
Latest member
Peterbuilt
Back
Top