J Blanchard Park #1

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got to get these out of my head so here's my latest "What IFs...":

What IF:

Some of the items found at JBP are connected to Caylees' death?

KC was involved in something shady like identity theft, *advertiser censored*...? Could explain KC's claims she was trying to protect her family. If one of these people threatened her with Caylees' death and KC didn't listen to them then maybe they went through with their threat and JBP was original scene of the crime and KC knew Caylee was at JBP. When LE didn't find Caylee at JBP KC moved her to Suburban crime scene hoping, maybe knowing Caylee would likely be found there (Roy K?).

Everything to do with ZFG was always meant to be a diversion for LE so that LE would focus on ZFG and not pursue any other possibilities? Could the ZFG story have been thought up by all the A's as a way to protect themselves from "the real killer" and LE?

I don't necessarily believe my "What IFs", but I do believe there is waayyy more to this case than we know. I do believe KC is responsible for Caylee's death, directly or indirectly.

P.S.
Mods, If this post should be on another thread please move!
 
They are looking at someone in a trailer park near Blanchard park, but are not releasing details of the Warrant.
They are being extremely tight lipped about this case.
Hopefully they are closing in on a suspect!
 
Local media reported:
it's a former worker at JBP who is an avid jogger. BRB, I'll find a link...
 
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,3783961.story

Investigators with the Orange County Sheriff's Office this morning confirmed they are questioning someone in connection to the 2008 murder of UCF student Nicole Ganguzza.

Homicide and sex crimes detectives at 7 a.m. served a search warrant on a person living in Colonial Village at 2105 Harrell Road. The trailer park is a little more than a mile from the Little Econ Trail where search crews had discovered the body of the 26-year-old jogger.

The search warrant is related to the Ganguzza murder case, sheriff's spokesman Jim Solomons said.

Residents said the man, who lives alone in the trailer, was escorted out by sheriff's deputies.
 
http://www.wftv.com/news/18851339/detail.html


Neighbors said he has lived there for a while and is rather quiet.


Eyewitness News was also able to confirm, through county records, that the man, 48, worked for the Orange County Parks division as a parks specialist from October 2006 until July 2008. Neighbors told Eyewitness News they would sometimes see him driving a golf cart around nearby Blanchard Park while working.
 
WOW, 48 sure doesn't fit with the sketch drawings, does it?

Noooope.
An awful lot of coincidences and things that make you go, "hmmm", though.
I certainly hope something comes of this, to offer Nicole's family and loved ones some answers...
 
if he's an avid jogger or bicyclist there, wonder if Exit13 ever crossed paths with him (or whoever Nicole's murderer is).... I seem to remember Exit13 (KC's friend/owner of the house called LakeVaj)saying here at WS (I'm quoting as well as I can remember) "I jog 3 times a week at Jay Blanchard Park, and I never saw KC and Caylee there...." He's also the one who later in his brief (November?) interview with LE said, 'she was normal, absolutely fine" and 'sure I'll provide the emails/texts between us' and then as the detective was closing the very brief interview he came out with, "I believe KC killed her kid and that she acted alone." LE asked why he thought that and he said "just an opinion". I always thought that was odd, to make such a strong (and specific) accusation to the police without substantiating it, specifying that she acted alone no less without offering the reason/specific information for this belief? Weird. (No accusation by me against this witness, just raised my hinkymeter or peculimeter.) Just can't imagine someone making an accusation like that to police without substantiating information, especially against a former friend. JMO But anyway, even though he's a guy, I think he's braver than I would be to jog alone 3 times a week in a place where someone was murdered.

That is good news if there is a lead in Nicole's case.
 
I alway wonder, if any clues where found when they were searching for Caylee.
 
I've got to get these out of my head so here's my latest "What IFs...":

What IF:

Some of the items found at JBP are connected to Caylees' death?

KC was involved in something shady like identity theft, *advertiser censored*...? Could explain KC's claims she was trying to protect her family. If one of these people threatened her with Caylees' death and KC didn't listen to them then maybe they went through with their threat and JBP was original scene of the crime and KC knew Caylee was at JBP. When LE didn't find Caylee at JBP KC moved her to Suburban crime scene hoping, maybe knowing Caylee would likely be found there (Roy K?).

Everything to do with ZFG was always meant to be a diversion for LE so that LE would focus on ZFG and not pursue any other possibilities? Could the ZFG story have been thought up by all the A's as a way to protect themselves from "the real killer" and LE?

I don't necessarily believe my "What IFs", but I do believe there is waayyy more to this case than we know. I do believe KC is responsible for Caylee's death, directly or indirectly.

P.S.
Mods, If this post should be on another thread please move!

I find when I read thru a thread that I begin to say "What if" alot also. Then I am always brought back to "IF" any of this were true, how would kc's behavior during the 31 days fit into these scenarios. For example, if she were involved in something shady, and shady people took her daughter to teach her a lesson, then wouldn't she have been sad or upset at some point during the 31 days?? That time frame is well documented in photos. Even if she couldn't TELL anyone what really went on, wouldn't her worry show on her face or in her actions? or did she just say, oh well, they took my daughter, I may as well make the most of the situation and go out partying as much as I can before they bring her back. Her actions during that time is critical evidence towards her guilt, and towards knocking down those "what if" theories that defense may come up with. This is also why I think the photos should all be admissible, the ones showing how she acted before the "alleged abduction" as well as the ones taken after.

Always, my own opinion & speculation.
 
I agree Lisa, but I think the pictures of the "partying" at Fusian that should be shown in court should be ALL the pictures, not just the closeups of KC supposedly "bumping and grinding" with another girl on the stage. Because when you look at the other pictures from Fusian that night, you can see that the "hot body dance" that KC was doing was quite tame compared to the general partying and the general mode of dress in in the club. And the text messages we've seen show us that KC was pressured to do the hot body contest in order to help with Tony's promotion, she was quasi working (not necessarily paid) for Tony, managing the "shot girls", etc. I agree with everything you said, her behavior during the time Caylee was missing is bizarre and inexplicable, UNLESS she believed Caylee was with someone who was not going to harm her, or she knew Caylee had been kidnapped but thought she would get Caylee back if she played someone's game and that if she went to the authorities Caylee would be killed--or if she was and is simply suffering from mental illness (which, frankly, I have not seen disproved), possibly brought on or exacerbated by a trauma that had occurred (to herself/Caylee) i.e. ptsd or something resulting in her being in a completely repressed state/denial. But there are so many unanswered questions, so many people not ruled out forensically, and the "partying" on the part of KC I think has been greatly exaggerated in the media, I'm not sure if she was enjoying herself while Caylee was gone, or if she was going around in a strange state of denial with her personality drastically altered as a result of some trauma. Her friends say the phone call from prison to her parents and the interviews while in prison and everything are totally weird to them because they are like a completely different person, not like KC at all, they were all shocked and blown away, and they say she would never have harmed Caylee. How could this change occur in such a short time? It's these things that make the "what ifs" keep creeping back in for me, although i can't rule out the main theory. I just still don't feel we have the whole picture. MOO
 
Seagull,
While her friends say KCs phone calls and interviews are like a totally different person and they are blown away because it wasn't like her at all, I imagine Amy H getting home from a fun trip to PR to find out her bff raided her bank account and the "moving in" gig was something that was never true could also say "KC is totally different and I'm blown away".
 
I am not, by nature, a "what iffer", but I certainly have been with this case.
Here's what I always come back to:
There is NOTHING...not one iota of evidence...that points to ANYONE other than Casey.
I do think, however, that there is much that we do not know that will be revealed at trial.
 
I am not, by nature, a "what iffer", but I certainly have been with this case.
Here's what I always come back to:
There is NOTHING...not one iota of evidence...that points to ANYONE other than Casey.I do think, however, that there is much that we do not know that will be revealed at trial.

Bolded by me, I T A !!!

There was a reference back in this thread to the Logan Tucker case (which I promptly had to read up on), where the mother was convicted, sentenced to LWOP. Such strong parallels to this case, and they were able to land the conviction with far less circumstantial evidence. I do hope there is a smoking gun, I hope for a couple of them. While I feel there is enough as it stands right now to convict, I know that it only takes one juror with doubts to stand in the way. I think TL & GA testimony will be very revealing.

Again, JMO.
 
Yes, who knows what will come out at trial (hopefully a lot more we don't know about.)

I think there's a good chance she'll be convicted simply because of her inability or refusal to tell the truth and her failure to report the disappearance. But I think we might never know what happened. If LE had taken the cadaver dogs around to all the other players' homes/vehicles/otherproperties etc, invited more people to take LDTs, and studied more people's computer records, etc, I would feel more confident in the main theory. But you can't have everything.
 
Seagull, how do we know Le didn't take the dogs other places? Do we know that for sure? Maybe that hasn't come out yet. Surely LE checked Tony's place and also his computer - no?
 
Seagull,
While her friends say KCs phone calls and interviews are like a totally different person and they are blown away because it wasn't like her at all, I imagine Amy H getting home from a fun trip to PR to find out her bff raided her bank account and the "moving in" gig was something that was never true could also say "KC is totally different and I'm blown away".

But see...that's the thing. I don't think she was any different than before. I think she'd been lying and stealing ever since she lost her job at Universal, but only recently had begun to get caught at it. She had been lying for two years that she had a job. And what about the lying about going to school at Valencia? She'd been lying about that for some time too. She lied about the father of Caylee - saying he died in a car accident, and then telling other people a different story. She'd been lying for some time. This wasn't new behavior for her IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
1,561
Total visitors
1,715

Forum statistics

Threads
606,232
Messages
18,200,900
Members
233,786
Latest member
KazPsi
Back
Top