Not to change topic, and do not know how to reference a compound idea but, I went over a news report about a girl that spent a lot of time with JLM at Liberty.
I am confused by her description and concern for JLM.
http://www.wset.com/story/26669474/classmate-of-jesse-matthews-speaks-out
As well, it is about the 3rd time someone has been interviewed and suggest to look into a team approach to the crime.
If that was the case, why is there uncertainty or action in identify other group members?
What if JLM has a way to leverage opportunity of other guys relationships with the girls, he gains the familiarity and confidence, then he makes a move to set up an opportunity and eventually acts.
This give JLM time to size up the personality and develop a custom approach. Other guys might be involved that have similar intentions but let JLM take all the risk. Or they know JLM's desire and encourage him. These guys are staying away.
A group approach could account for the large number of missing girls along 29. Their collective work to conceal the victims.
<modsnip>
This might fall into the logic of the HM T-shirt being placed across a bush in front of the apartment complex.
The ones where JLM is caught are a result of working alone with more difficulty hiding the victims. Again, the guys that know JLM remain distant from the him. I believe a deeper review of his male associates/friends would be useful in getting to know JLM.