Truth Detector
Your Humble Observer
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
- Messages
- 5,392
- Reaction score
- 7
This "Polyanna Comment" by JA is very conflicting - in my opinion, because: JA wants the Jury to believe Travis didn't refer to her as A *advertiser censored*....YET, she wants the Jury to believe Travis deserved to be killed/murdered by her.
MOO
If JA doesn't want the jury to think TA referred to her that way then why does she keep telling them that TA called her that and many other names which were sexually degrading?
That's exactly what JA and Nurmi want the jury to think.
Where I think the defense is going: TA wanted the sex to continue but didn't want to commit. JA was tired of being degraded and abused and only made that final, fateful trip for a last goodbye and to break it off. Travis was having none of it. He was already miffed, but suddenly and totally snapped when she dropped the camera. He attacked her and she had no choice but to stab him. When he didn't immediately die, but instead lunged toward her, she had to stab him again, and again, and again, and again (all a giant blur, she can't remember slitting his throat) but then she finally had to shoot him to ensure that he stopped attacking her. She knew that no one would believe the awful truth -- she could barely believe it herself -- so she had to make up the false absence and ninja intruder stories. But when finally arrested and charged, she knew that she had to tell the truth, because that's what Travis would have wanted.