Piecing Together the Truth Behind Jodi Arias' Lies -- The Details of Travis Alexander's Death - YouTube
I can't figure out what JA is saying at the very end of this video?! It does not go with the captions IMO
Can anyone help me out? It's driving me nuts...
I thought she said last Wednesday that Chastity wasn't discussed with the young Mormon men who visited her - she seemed to imply they were too embarrassed... :waitasec: Then again, I'm easily confused.
I thought she said it was through Travis only that she learned about the topic - conveniently throwing him under in the process...
Unless corroborated, I don't believe a thing JA says, especially when it's self-serving.
Oh wait - it's ALL self-serving.
In the video with Jodi and Travis pics ..I can not figure out what he (JM) is pointing to I see the KY he is pointing to but is he pointing to a tv? later on ...You know the pics at end with no sound .
So reviewing those pics again (ugh), let's see. He's now supposed to be a pedophile interested in little boys, but he also likes pigtails, breast implants and female genitalia so much he took up close photos of it. Gawd, this is the "throw every sexual button pusher against the wall and see what sticks" defense.
I agree! I never really would associate the braids and *advertiser censored* kinda man would also be a gay pedophile.. I could fathom it maybe more so if she lied and said it was pictures of young girls on his computer but young boys is a very far-fetched leap, IMO.
And, this may be just me over-thinking things BUT if you were a man into males, wouldn't you not be less likely to be grossed out by kissing someone who gave you oral? I wouldn't know, really, but it just seems it.
"MOO" as a recently learned..
:liar:
Speaking of gender role reversals ..first, I agree with the post above that if the same facts had been committed by a male against a female, this would be a different case and probably wouldn't even be that newsworthy.
Think about this -- imagine all the same facts but reverse the gender roles. Think about a man showing up at his ex girlfriend's house in the middle of the night, without notice; police discovered naked photographs of both male and female; police found deleted photos of the female taking a shower, looking hesitant and surprised and ultimately seated in the shower a minute before her throat is slashed.
What conclusion would you immediately draw from those facts? That the male raped the female and humiliated her by photographing her and then made her take a shower to remove evidence of the assault before he brutally murdered her? That is what I would think.
I have not really seen any discussions along these lines, but I think it's possible that is exactly what happened between Jodi and Travis. Why not? She was armed with a gun and a knife, and the element of surprise would be enough to take control of Travis. She may have even tied him up -- maybe this is why she has come up with this story of the "soft rope" and cutting it with a knife. It's possible she took the pics of herself while he was tied up and had duct tape over his mouth -- there was obviously duct tape nearby, and as far as I know there was no roll of duct tape recovered from the scene. If Travis had a gun to his head from the time he woke up, he would most likely do whatever she told him to do. If she maintained enough distance from him, he would not be able to overcome her with force without risking being shot. She could have had the camera in her hand taking pictures of him without holding the camera to her face, and at the same time had the gun pointed at him, directing him to turn different ways.
If the roles were reversed, this is probably what I would think happened. Our society is pretty programmed to think of males as aggressors and females as victims when it comes to physical and sexual assault, but women can victimize men in the same way. The fact that Jodi committed such a violent brutal murder would have been hard to fathom if we didn't have photographic evidence and a confession -- so maybe Jodi committed other atrocities before the murder that we would not ordinarily think a female capable of or inclined to do.
I haven't really held this scenario up to all the evidence to figure out if it's plausible, but it's something to think about. Not that we will ever know, but it would at least explain the dissonance of having sex immediately before slashing, stabbing and shooting someone.
I agree! I never really would associate the braids and *advertiser censored* kinda man would also be a gay pedophile.. I could fathom it maybe more so if she lied and said it was pictures of young girls on his computer but young boys is a very far-fetched leap, IMO.
And, this may be just me over-thinking things BUT if you were a man into males, wouldn't you not be less likely to be grossed out by kissing someone who gave you oral? I wouldn't know, really, but it just seems it.
"MOO" as a recently learned..
:liar:
I learned last week that the "drunk lady' was a long time friend of Travis'. Everyone knew them as platonic friends in that crowd. Well, everyone except Jodi of course. She spun this story as if he had a one night stand in public with a stranger. It was one of his good friends.
Investigators discovered photographs of the two having rough sex on a camera that was recovered from the scene of the crime.
small point.....a male pedo that perps on boys does not necessarily indicate that he is gay.
Okay, so this is really creepy to me. I found a
Robert Juarez killed a month after Travis Alexander??? Could (and I know, probably a long shot.....but could jodi's Bobby Juarez be officially Robert?)
This guy was gunned down on July 10. jodi didn't go to jail until July 15, five days later.
IMHO, the suspect in the second shot could be jodi.
Holy crap. What if?? This case sure has a lot of odd coincidences.......or does it?
Thoughts?
http://www.utsandiego.com/photos/2010/jul/09/193763/
If this and the Anthony case don't call for a remake of our judicial system, I don't know what does. Being able to "invent-a-defense" without even an iota of presentable evidence is laughable at best. And so is conducting a trial in early 2013 when the crime took place in mid-2008 ... let's give the defense four and a half years to concoct a story and rehearse the defendant's testimony. And top of that, let's drag the jury through short work days, off days, numerous sidebars, and evidential hearings ... maybe they'll get so fed up, they'll say "enough is enough" and acquit the murderess.So reviewing those pics again (ugh), let's see. He's now supposed to be a pedophile interested in little boys, but he also likes pigtails, breast implants and female genitalia so much he took up close photos of it. Gawd, this is the "throw every sexual button pusher against the wall and see what sticks" defense.
Minor 4th,
Not only can a woman be just as brutal as a man. I believe females can deceive and cause men to commit crimes too. I am female and a lot of women won't like me saying it but to anyone who questions this, just pay attention to this trial. I rest my case!
I thought some of you might want a refresher of the facts, story of this relationship, murder
Investigators discovered photographs of the two having rough sex on a camera that was recovered from the scene of the crime.The defence team has also outlined the hundreds of sexual emails and text sent between the two, in which Alexander called his girlfriend a '*advertiser censored*' and a '*advertiser censored*' in one message.[/B]