I hope you'll add your notes to those of our other trial attendees. They are invaluable, and I so appreciate the first hand accounting.
As I said before I'm sure he doesn't give a rats *advertiser censored* about what anyone thinks of the job he is doing.Juan is not there for public approval. He is there for one purpose and thats to get a conviction, his record speaks for itself.
Ah, okay thanks for the info!No, it's standard for a court reporter to sign such a document stating it is a true and accurate transcription done to the best of their ability. They also sometimes include something stating they are not related to any party and do not have a vested interest in the outcome of a proceeding. I used to do transcription and always signed such a document.
I hope you'll add your notes to those of our other trial attendees. They are invaluable, and I so appreciate the first hand accounting.
I think that Jodi just likes to remind everyone as often as possible how wonderfully desirable and irresistable she is to guys. :floorlaugh:
FWIW, my husband is a certified firearms instructor & he pointed out that it's very unlikely that an abused and untrained woman would instinctively run for a gun to defend herself, especially a gun she'd only seen once before in someone else's closet. He also wants to know where the extra ammo was, why the gun was not in it's case, why he didn't keep it more accessible if it was for home defense, and why a guy like Travis would buy a .25 - apparently NOT a very manly weapon, lol!
I'd really like to read that article. I'll help search for it. If you find it, please post it.Questioning a sociopath is different than questioning a non-sociopath. You have to get under their skin to show their true colors. Basically she has been treated as a hostile witness for her refusal to answer yes or no questions for one. Does anyone have that article on how to cross-examine a sociopath handy to link...since i didn't save it and now i can't find it. :banghead:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Just for the record, my opinion of Martinez was formed exclusively from his performance in this case and what I've read about him from links posted here and related reading. I have never heard of him before and had no personal opinion about his work until I saw him for the first time when I sat through the first day I attended of this trial. As I said, I don't care what anyone else thinks of him or what anyone else thinks of my opinion of him, so I'm not going to respond to details of your post.
Juan is a seasned proscutor...and I have no doubt that his first day crossiing Jodi, was methodical. He knows what he doing. MOO
As I said before I'm sure he doesn't give a rats *advertiser censored* about what anyone thinks of the job he is doing.Juan is not there for public approval. He is there for one purpose and thats to get a conviction, his record speaks for itself.
Questioning a sociopath is different than questioning a non-sociopath. You have to get under their skin to show their true colors. Basically she has been treated as a hostile witness for her refusal to answer yes or no questions for one. Does anyone have that article on how to cross-examine a sociopath handy to link...since i didn't save it and now i can't find it. :banghead:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
When court was slightly delayed (remember we went from court activity to the seal and back again?), I thought for sure she pulled that.
Even when she got on the stand, I thought she would pretend to hyperventilate or faint or something - instead she foolishly took him on toe to toe.
I'm thinking now would be a more appropriate time for her to pull that knowing what she's up against.
GO JUAN!!
I wonder who was next on Jodi's list. The .25 didn't work well as a murder weapon, so she bought a more powerful one.
Exactly. Right out of the gate with a bogus "double standard" argument. EVERYONE knows it's perfectly fine to insult your own family members lol, but no one else had better do it! My kids call each other names daily. But their friends had better not. And their mom?! No way. I couldn't believe Martinez even argued that AT ALL, much less strenuously. :::sigh:::
It was me. I have no agenda against Martinez. I just thought his cross s*cked. Apparently that makes me an unethical member of the defense team lol
I'd really like to read that article. I'll help search for it. If you find it, please post it.