RR0004
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 19,987
- Reaction score
- -26
...in the pelvic area (or something like that...lol).cosmetic procedure.. i think
...in the pelvic area (or something like that...lol).cosmetic procedure.. i think
Thanks for the reply! i enjoyed your post. I agree, I believe he was shot last, and the blood drip on shower resulted from attack in or right by shower. I have just never noticed the things I marked until txblondie pointed out what looked like blood on shower. If I saw that as a juror (assuming it is a blood drip) it would lead me to believe the attack started in/by shower where he was taken off guard and stabbed and she was lying about shooting him first in the closet.
That picture of the robe still hanging up is sooo creepy to me.
That is not allowed. Do you know where you heard it and if so, did it come from a reputable source? Is this why she is claiming to her friend BC she will have a mistrial?
Looking at her rental contract, it looks like a smoke smell was noted as part of her initial inspection when she rented the car -- although this was not stated by the rental guy in his testimony.
Hello Alix and welcome to WS! :seeya:
I have researched DV extensively and I agree with you . . . there is no credible evidence of DV that has come to light and JA continually minimizes the "abuse" or is exposed to be fabricating . . . .
he grabbed my wrist, he squeezed me, he yelled @ me . . . .
yet she says she always had free will and always returned (or initiated contact) and that contact was mutual.
She stayed in the house despite her "extreme fear" for her life? . . . .she had the means and the mode of transportation to get out of the relationship - she stalked him - she could have moved and left no forwarding address . . . no more phone calls, no more texts, no more phone sex, no more payments, no more borrowing, no more contact . . . . she didn't leave him alone.
This is not congruent with other DV victims who are powerless to their abuser . . . .she was not powerless, she was not unable to keep herself safe, she had complete and total power and control over her own thoughts and actions.
I have never met a DV victim who had those luxuries!
quote from article:
The only things reported taken were the handgun, a DVD player, and $30, while other valuable items, including a large pile of quarters and three other guns, were left untouched. Arias told police that her laptop computer was not taken because she had hidden it in a laundry basket covered with clothes.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jodi-arias-denied-guilt-told-sex-photos-palm/story?id=18211547
My first post on this thread... Just been reading.
However all of this "we" talk go me to thinking... Don't know if I believe it or not but I am throwing it out there...
JM keeps asking if MM was with her at DB's. he has asked her that several times. many of her purchases where for 2 of the same items (food, sunscreen). Could she drove her car and mm drove rental or vice versa?
JM keeps asking her are you sure MM would never betray you? He talks about him a bit and then right when you think he is getting to something good, he leaves the subject of MM.
Also Jodi's story 2.0 was that there was a man and a woman...
For arguments sake, lets say MM turned state witness and they offered him immunity/ reduced sentence for his testimony against her. I assume that would be part of discovery and would have to be turned over to defense?
Can someone tell me why she does not want to admit to a 3rd gas can? What's the significance of it? Thanks!
That's only if the camera was accurate.
Correct, however a mistrial would buy her more time in county jail as opposed to being a convicted murderer on death row, or at the least LWOP. All guilty defendants who realize they aren't going to be acquitted would love a mistrial!
MOO
Wow I do need to go back and see the am' testimony.
I think that's also the reason why at some times she seemed to be positively giddy testifying. She's also working the mitigation angle now. After seeing her in action today, I can't help but wonder how many jurors think she's just plain crazy.BBM
This is the one and only reason that I think she is purposely throwing "we" out there every now and then. I believe she is hoping that at least one jury member will pick up on it to cause reasonable doubt.
Do you guys have a copy of the contract? Or just the return slip? I actually worked at Enterprise at the airport for a while, not anywhere near the airport she rented from though. Our counter was right next to Budget, and we all got along well, they are franchised so some could have different policies but I know here they were not supposed to rent cars that had been smoked in unless they were properly cleaned. On return, there would be a "check in" before the contract was officially closed, and issues would be noted before officially returning so as to charge the customer. For smoking, there is a charge of I believe $200, or at least that is what is what here.
I went back and found what he said, in reference to her getting a brazilian wax:
You were embarrassed because you had just taken some cosmetic approach to your pelvic area
LOL
I hope Juan keeps his day job as a prosecutor and doesn't try his luck at becoming an aesthetician. Although he would make the waxing services sound very lovely. :floorlaugh:
Another part of testimony I missed I guess. Did she say why she had taken the remote with her? TIA :wave: