Jean Cesarez (sp?) just said this will be very effective, "It paints a very BAD portrait of Travis Alexander." (I think that's what she said - it's close.
Say what?
What is BAD about what he's saying? Anyone? It's a private talk about private matters... it's raunchy - not meant for all ears to hear... but what's bad about it? He's a sexually healthy, energized 29-30 (?) year old man. It's sex talk. Some to say it, some like to think it, some like to hear it, some don't like it...
ITS_JUST_SEX.
I didn't hear anything "bad" in any of that (other than it was unfairly and prejudicially edited. Now that's bad).
She's stupid....this is redundant....and anything can be taken out of context!
I really don't know how this gets in...
I love JM is objecting, I think he is speaking for the jury!~